Checking out through PB doesn't lock an object. This means multiple persons 
could work at the same object at the same time however merging isn't 
something that can be done automatically very easy.

Arthur

<pau.fraces@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:012cef1c-03b4-4776-922c-abda282b5147@t26g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 13, 5:32 am, "Arthur Hefti" <art...@catsoft.ch> wrote:
> Why don't you want to use a SCC connection?
>
> We're using PB with PushOK and Subversion and with most projects the
> Subversion integration of Trac. We have an Orca script to create the 
> initial
> pbls of a project and one to build the project.
>
> Arthur
>
> <pau.fra...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:b7156526-7fea-41cb-b722-20c5c89e2f8d@t26g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 12, 11:44 pm, Arnd Schmidt <arnd.schm...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Sorry for the typos...
> > .. Bootstrapping fromwww.sqlbatch.comis...
>
> > Arnd
>
> > On 12 Jan 2009 13:15:30 -0800, Arnd Schmidt <arnd.schm...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > >Hi,
>
> > >I can only recommend to use the SVN Proxy fromwww.pushok.com.
> > >You'll save a lot of time and money.
>
> > >Try bootstrapping via oracscript.
>
> > >The Bootstrapping fromwww.slqbatch.comisalso worth it's money,
> > >if classic orcascript fails.
>
> > >Also E.Crane's PowerGen (www.ecrane.,com) can help.
>
> > >Arnd
>
> > >On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:27:13 -0800 (PST), pau.fra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > >>Hi all,
>
> > >>I'm working in a PowerBuilder 10.2 developers team, and 6 months ago
> > >>we thought about using a source control.
> > >>The best option for our purposes we found was the combination of
> > >>Subversion and Trac, but Trac only has a diff tool for plain-text
> > >>files and PB works with the binary pbl's.
> > >>We think is better choice the Copy-Modify-Merge solution than the 
> > >>Lock-
> > >>Modify-Unlock one, so we need a way to manage the entire export of an
> > >>application and the bootstrap import of sr? files without locking/
> > >>unlocking files.
>
> > >>Our first attempt was connecting PB to SCC (using PB Native) having
> > >>all files in the local machine of each one and then sending the sr?
> > >>files to the subversion repository. We are already working in that
> > >>way, with a little application developed by myself which manage the
> > >>process.
>
> > >>We don't use pfc's (yet) but a pb environment created by ourselves
> > >>wich reduces our development time.
> > >>Is when managing that dependencies where my little application loose
> > >>stability because the management of prp's, pbg's and other things...
>
> > >>Becouse of that and other troubles I'm working in a new approach:
>
> > >>No more using PB Native but managing by myself the export/import of
> > >>the whole application with ORCA (or ORCA-based tools) and finally
> > >>commit the sr? files to the svn repository.
>
> > >>By now, the export phase is working successfully using the Dmitry
> > >>Lukyanov's PBORCA script tool, but I was unable to success the
> > >>bootstrap import with it and he doesn't reply my email yet, so I've
> > >>tried to develop with ORCA directly, using gcc, but the linker reports
> > >>me an error, so I think the pborca.lib has been built with another
> > >>compiler (maybe with the VisualStudio one?). The following will be to
> > >>try it with VC++.
>
> > >>How to compile an ORCA application? Is there any examples? (I was
> > >>unable to find the orc5smpl.zip quoted in the ORCA documentation page)
> > >>Any suggestions about bootstrapping an application with ORCA without
> > >>using SCC functions?
>
> > >>New approaches for our global purpose (PB + Subversion + Trac
> > >>integration) are welcome!
>
> > >>Thanks in advance and sorry for my poor English.
>
> Very thanks for your quick reply.
>
> The problem with pushok svn proxy and ORCAScript bootstrapping is the
> required SCC connection.
> PowerBath (from sqlbatch.com) and PowerGen maybe are a solution but I
> want to try with free tools first.
>
> How to compile an ORCA application? Is VisualStudio required?

We wants stop using the lock/unlock of objects in favor of svn copy-
modify-merge approach and I think SCC check-in/check-out cycle is
unnecessary, isn't it?

Pau