LMPX.COM |
Home | Linux | Mysql | PHP | XML | ||
|
|
|||
From: Stanislav Malyshev Date: Tue Jun 10 03:17:00 2008 Subject: Re: intl 1.0.0RC1
Hi! > Yes. Why can't it be IntlCollator in both 5.x and 6.x? In other words > (unless I'm missing something) compatibility between 5.x and 6.x doesn't > affect the naming choice. The thing is that having collators in PHP called IntlCollator and locales in PHP called IntlLocale sucks. It looks so awkward and artificial. > I'm advocating uniformity for the sake of usability :-). (for reasons I don't see how IntlLocale is more usable than Locale. If you'd be total stranger to all the things discussed here and I'd tell you - there's a thing called "locale", what do you think would be the name of the class that works with it - would you answer "Locale" or "IntlLocale"? > already given). (I'm a freelance programmer, working on real-world > i18n-related code, not an ivory tower academic.) OK, great - and you'd prefer all your functions and classes to have prefix Intl because of that? I know I wouldn't. I would like to have class named Locale to work with locales. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com
| Navigate in group php.i18n at sever news.php.net | |
| Previous | Next |
| © No Copyright You are free to use Anything |
Site Maintained by Zareef Ahmed
Powered By PHP Consultants |