Tim Harsch wrote:
> Uh... whoops.  Sorry for my seemingly senseless reply on this before, I
> realize now that I missed reading most of the problem.  Luckily,  it looks
> like Jarkko has a solution for you.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jarkko Hietaniemi" <jhi@iki.fi>
> To: <Krist.vanBesien@BIT.admin.ch>
> Cc: <perl-64bit@perl.org>; <Elian.Esseiva@BIT.admin.ch>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 11:07 AM
> Subject: Re: Problems building 64BIT perl on Solaris.
> 
> 
> 
>>I asked a Solaris build guru, and he replied:
>>
>>
>>>>LD_RUN_PATH="" gcc  -mcpu=v9 -m64 -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib/sparcv9
> 
> C.o
> 
>>>>-o ../../../lib/auto/B/C/C.so
>>>>Undefined                       first referenced
>>>
>>>        [etc.]
>>>
>>>There's a missing '-G' in there.  That's supposed to be in lddlflags.
>>>hints/solaris_2.sh was supposed to add that flag -- it's what's used
>>>to tell ld that it's building a shared library, not a full executable
>>>file.
>>>
>>>Now why the hints file missed it, I don't know, but that's the
>>>problem.
>>
>>--
>>Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this
> 
> special
> 
>>biologist word we use for 'stable'.  It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen
> 
> 
test