On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:42:09AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> 1: by the way I had to fight a little when I starting working on Coat, 
> some people were angry because of the idea behind Coat; I'm happy to see 
> that, at the end, I was right: there's is room and even need for 
> light-weight Mooses.

No, the fight was because you weren't really trying to be compatible at
that point, more "inspired by".

Hence Mouse.

Personally, I'd suggest you consider contributing to Mouse - it's much more
robust, cleanly designed code than Coat and because of the meta compatibility
the upgrade path is much cleaner.

-- 
      Matt S Trout       Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
   Technical Director                    http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
 Shadowcat Systems Ltd.  Want a managed development or deployment platform?
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/            http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/