| # | subject | author | date | lines |
| 1192 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | John Porter |
Mon Aug 21 13:28:43 2000 |
22 |
| 1193 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | Larry Wall |
Mon Aug 21 15:32:46 2000 |
24 |
| 1194 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES","STATUS" sections | Dave Storrs |
Mon Aug 21 16:25:12 2000 |
28 |
| 1195 | Re: RFC format | Nathan Torkington |
Tue Aug 22 01:05:49 2000 |
12 |
| 1196 | Re: It's August the 18th! | Nathan Torkington |
Tue Aug 22 01:23:48 2000 |
12 |
| 1197 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | Chaim Frenkel |
Tue Aug 22 05:20:32 2000 |
14 |
| 1198 | Re: RFC format | Michael G Schwern |
Tue Aug 22 08:56:50 2000 |
13 |
| 1199 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | John Porter |
Tue Aug 22 14:47:56 2000 |
17 |
| 1200 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | Larry Wall |
Tue Aug 22 14:52:50 2000 |
13 |
| 1201 | Re: RFC format | Nathan Torkington |
Tue Aug 22 15:32:46 2000 |
14 |
| 1202 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | Chaim Frenkel |
Tue Aug 22 16:15:32 2000 |
16 |
| 1203 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH","REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | Buddha Buck |
Tue Aug 22 16:17:49 2000 |
25 |
| 1204 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | Larry Wall |
Tue Aug 22 16:40:13 2000 |
22 |
| 1205 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | Chaim Frenkel |
Tue Aug 22 22:20:04 2000 |
16 |
| 1206 | Re: RFC format | Bradley M. Kuhn |
Wed Aug 23 08:33:06 2000 |
37 |
| 1207 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | Bradley M. Kuhn |
Wed Aug 23 08:35:24 2000 |
48 |
| 1208 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | John Porter |
Wed Aug 23 13:29:21 2000 |
29 |
| 1209 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | Larry Wall |
Wed Aug 23 16:29:26 2000 |
17 |
| 1210 | new list: perl6-meta@perl.org | Ask Bjoern Hansen |
Wed Aug 23 18:07:55 2000 |
20 |
| 1211 | Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections | Chaim Frenkel |
Wed Aug 23 23:13:40 2000 |
18 |
| 1212 | perl6-meta opened, bootstrap closed. | Ask Bjoern Hansen |
Sun Aug 27 04:55:04 2000 |
13 |