Re: Remove alt.checkmate from your banlist immediately.

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 20:36:09 +0000, Steve wrote:

> Nadegda wrote:
>> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 21:57:36 +0000, Steve wrote:
>> 
>> > Nadegda wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> >> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 21:24:31 +0000, Steve drooled:
>> >> 
>> >> > Nadegda wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> >> >> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:17:50 +0000, Steve wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Nadegda wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> >> >> >> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:44:39 +0000, Steve wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Worf (Paul Derbyshire)
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> Proof, kook?
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Caught cock in hand
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Please to be pointing to where Worf was "caught". MID, link, etc.
>> >> 
>> >> <crickets>
>> >> 
>> >> >> > and you still want proof?
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> You asserted that Worf was this Derbyshire person. Yours is the
>> >> >> burden of proof if challenged to substantiate that claim.
>> >> 
>> >> <crickets>
>> >> 
>> >> >> > I don't need to provide proof.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> You do if you want anyone to believe your random-seeming claims
>> >> >> that assorted people are Derbyshire, kooky.
>> >> 
>> >> <crickets>
>> >> 
>> >> >> > Nobody but one of your socks would 
>> >> >> > try to defend you. One comes along out of the blue to defend 
>> >> >> > 'Kensi' and then along comes your Nads sock to defend the other 
>> >> >> > sock. Classic and totally predictable Paul Derbyshire behaviour.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Circular "reasoning": anyone who has ever sided with anyone you've
>> >> >> ever claimed is a "Derbyshire sock" is also a "Derbyshire sock".
>> >> >> Combine with six degrees of separation and *everyone* on Usenet is a
>> >> >> "Derbyshire sock" by your criteria. Including you.
>> >> 
>> >> <crickets>
>> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Erroneously presupposes that an IP address is as good as a birth
>> >> >> >> > certificate. In reality, the most an IP will normally tell you is
>> >> >> >> > that a post came from a particular city, petaQ. To assert on that
>> >> >> >> > basis that it was one particular person among teeming millions is
>> >> >> >> > to claim to have psychic powers.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> Oh I see. You're sore because you got SPNAKed,
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Oh grow up you pathetic git. You haven't spanked me. You've done 
>> >> >> > fuck all to me. The only power you have is limited to your fantasy 
>> >> >> > world.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> By the same argument, the only power *you* have is limited to *your*
>> >> >> fantasy world.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> At least I can distinguish between mine and reality. Neener.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> <snicker>
>> >> 
>> >> <crickets>
>> >> 
>> >> >> >> and your go-to move
>> >> >> >> is to accuse anybody who humiliates you of being this "Paul" person.
>> >> >> >> I guess you feel that doing so somehow grants you power over them,
>> >> >> >> even though it does nothing of the kind and they will continue on
>> >> >> >> about their lives completely unperturbed.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > You only humiliate yourself and irritate everyone else.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> And what do you think *you've* been doing? You're known far and wide
>> >> >> as "that kook who posts about nothing else than his Derbyshire
>> >> >> obsession, year after year after year". Tell me, when was the last
>> >> >> time you contributed anything actually useful to any newsgroup?
>> >> >> All I've ever seen you do is flog your pet theory with nearly as
>> >> >> much persistence as your garden variety spammer flogging a dubious
>> >> >> product or service, if, thankfully, a much lower posting volume. If
>> >> >> you ever ran for office it would be as a single-issue candidate, and
>> >> >> you'd get about the same number of votes as the UFO-truther candidate
>> >> >> and the ban-videogames candidate.
>> >> 
>> >> <crickets>
>> >> 
>> >> >> > 'Kensi' has been posting for about 10 days with his
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Her!
>> >> > 
>> >> > Blah, blah, bluster, bluster. Same tired old denial.
>> >> > I note yet again you've snipped what you can't deal with, and I 
>> >> > think everyone else reading this will have noticed that too.
>> >> > Crosspost restored for archive purposes.
>> >> > Chickenshit.
>> >> > 
>> >> > PS. Show us yer tits, Paul!
>> >> 
>> >> Tacit admission that you are utterly unable to refute any of my points
>> >> noted and logged. That you respond to reasoned arguments (that happen
>> >> to utterly demolish your position) with a cussword-and-namecalling-laced
>> >> rantfest has also been noted and logged.
>> >> 
>> >> SPNAK!
>> >> 
>> >> <snicker>
>> > 
>> > Stick your SPNAK up your flabby arse, Paul.
>> > It's meaningless and it only has room in your head because your 
>> > brain is crosswired.
>> > Your vanity froup restored. You're welcome.
>> 
>> Wow, you are getting frothy lately! Are you always this sore a loser or is
>> the COVID lockdown stress getting to you?
>> 
>> <snicker>
> 
> I am neither frothing or in lockdown.

And now a foamy denial.

Tell me, have you, at any time in the past entire year, authored one single
usenet post that was useful or even on topic for every group in which you
posted it? Or, indeed, one on any topic other than your bogeyman? If so,
feel free to supply a MID. If you don't, though, you'll wear the "obsessed
kook with some ax to grind" label for the rest of your days.

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Checkmate admits that, for all intents and purposes, he carries a teddy
bear in public: <[email protected]>