Re: Remove alt.checkmate from your banlist immediately.

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:56:20 +0000, Steve wrote:

> Nadegda wrote:
>> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 20:36:09 +0000, Steve wrote:
>> 
>> > Nadegda wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> >> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 21:57:36 +0000, Steve wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Nadegda wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> >> >> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 21:24:31 +0000, Steve drooled:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Nadegda wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> >> >> >> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:17:50 +0000, Steve wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Nadegda wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:44:39 +0000, Steve wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > Worf (Paul Derbyshire)
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> Proof, kook?
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Caught cock in hand
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> Please to be pointing to where Worf was "caught". MID, link, etc.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> <crickets>
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > and you still want proof?
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> You asserted that Worf was this Derbyshire person. Yours is the
>> >> >> >> burden of proof if challenged to substantiate that claim.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> <crickets>
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > I don't need to provide proof.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> You do if you want anyone to believe your random-seeming claims
>> >> >> >> that assorted people are Derbyshire, kooky.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> <crickets>
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Nobody but one of your socks would 
>> >> >> >> > try to defend you. One comes along out of the blue to defend 
>> >> >> >> > 'Kensi' and then along comes your Nads sock to defend the other 
>> >> >> >> > sock. Classic and totally predictable Paul Derbyshire behaviour.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> Circular "reasoning": anyone who has ever sided with anyone you've
>> >> >> >> ever claimed is a "Derbyshire sock" is also a "Derbyshire sock".
>> >> >> >> Combine with six degrees of separation and *everyone* on Usenet is a
>> >> >> >> "Derbyshire sock" by your criteria. Including you.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> <crickets>
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > Erroneously presupposes that an IP address is as good as a birth
>> >> >> >> >> > certificate. In reality, the most an IP will normally tell you is
>> >> >> >> >> > that a post came from a particular city, petaQ. To assert on that
>> >> >> >> >> > basis that it was one particular person among teeming millions is
>> >> >> >> >> > to claim to have psychic powers.
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> Oh I see. You're sore because you got SPNAKed,
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Oh grow up you pathetic git. You haven't spanked me. You've done 
>> >> >> >> > fuck all to me. The only power you have is limited to your fantasy 
>> >> >> >> > world.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> By the same argument, the only power *you* have is limited to *your*
>> >> >> >> fantasy world.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> At least I can distinguish between mine and reality. Neener.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> <snicker>
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> <crickets>
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> and your go-to move
>> >> >> >> >> is to accuse anybody who humiliates you of being this "Paul" person.
>> >> >> >> >> I guess you feel that doing so somehow grants you power over them,
>> >> >> >> >> even though it does nothing of the kind and they will continue on
>> >> >> >> >> about their lives completely unperturbed.
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > You only humiliate yourself and irritate everyone else.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> And what do you think *you've* been doing? You're known far and wide
>> >> >> >> as "that kook who posts about nothing else than his Derbyshire
>> >> >> >> obsession, year after year after year". Tell me, when was the last
>> >> >> >> time you contributed anything actually useful to any newsgroup?
>> >> >> >> All I've ever seen you do is flog your pet theory with nearly as
>> >> >> >> much persistence as your garden variety spammer flogging a dubious
>> >> >> >> product or service, if, thankfully, a much lower posting volume. If
>> >> >> >> you ever ran for office it would be as a single-issue candidate, and
>> >> >> >> you'd get about the same number of votes as the UFO-truther candidate
>> >> >> >> and the ban-videogames candidate.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> <crickets>
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > 'Kensi' has been posting for about 10 days with his
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> Her!
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Blah, blah, bluster, bluster. Same tired old denial.
>> >> >> > I note yet again you've snipped what you can't deal with, and I 
>> >> >> > think everyone else reading this will have noticed that too.
>> >> >> > Crosspost restored for archive purposes.
>> >> >> > Chickenshit.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > PS. Show us yer tits, Paul!
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Tacit admission that you are utterly unable to refute any of my points
>> >> >> noted and logged. That you respond to reasoned arguments (that happen
>> >> >> to utterly demolish your position) with a cussword-and-namecalling-laced
>> >> >> rantfest has also been noted and logged.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> SPNAK!
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> <snicker>
>> >> > 
>> >> > Stick your SPNAK up your flabby arse, Paul.
>> >> > It's meaningless and it only has room in your head because your 
>> >> > brain is crosswired.
>> >> > Your vanity froup restored. You're welcome.
>> >> 
>> >> Wow, you are getting frothy lately! Are you always this sore a loser or is
>> >> the COVID lockdown stress getting to you?
>> >> 
>> >> <snicker>
>> > 
>> > I am neither frothing or in lockdown.
>> 
>> And now a foamy denial.
> 
> In your fantasy world you can be whatever you like and I can be 
> whatever you like,

How ironic.

> but in the real world you're a sorry little oik that plays at being women on
> usenet. That's how bothered I am at you calling me foamy.

Bothered enough to froth out another paragraph of kookfoam.

<snicker>

>> Tell me, have you, at any time in the past entire year, authored one single
>> usenet post that was useful or even on topic for every group in which you
>> posted it? Or, indeed, one on any topic other than your bogeyman? If so,
>> feel free to supply a MID.
> 
> I'm not telling you what groups I read and participate in.

So, "no" then.

No surprise there, really.

<snicker>

>> If you don't, though, you'll wear the "obsessed
>> kook with some ax to grind" label for the rest of your days.
> 
> O, woe is me! The silly little autistic oik that plays at being 
> women on usenet is calling me obsessed!

Remind me again which one of us is a single-issue poster?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Checkmate admits that, for all intents and purposes, he carries a teddy
bear in public: <[email protected]>