Re: Rogue cancel from miakibot

Paul a émis l'idée suivante :
> On 5/4/2022 6:07 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I hope it's the good groop for this plaint.
>> 
>> Your server accept since few days the cancels from "miakibot2".
>> 
>> A lot of cancel from this robot is not legitimate cancel.
>> But it's a cancel war againt one person.
>> A lot of French users are not for these cancels which are not consensual
>> 
>> You should know that that the "miakibot" has already deleted last year
>> more than 3600 messages from another person (Pierre) in a very abusive
>> way. This time his target is "Neo".
>> 
>> Please, block these cancellations of the miakibot of which a great part
>> is abusive or block the cancellations of the servers from which these
>> abusive cancellations come from (server ALPHANET which does not want to
>> do anything and produce)
>> 
>> sincerely yours,
>> 
>> Examples of recent abusives cancels:
>> 
>> Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]>
>> <[email protected]>
>
> You want eternal-september.org
>
> The address for correspondence/email is:
>
>      mail-complaints-to = "[email protected]"
>
> ******************************************************
>
> http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Ct4h2np%2418b%241%40dont-email.me%3E
>
>     Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>
>     Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; 
> posting-host="567ad90b4411d4bd307d983d52254db1";
>        logging-data="1291"; 
> mail-complaints-to="[email protected]";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8bpji8EfGproVjviyQY8m"
>     User-Agent: MacCafe/2.07 (4D18) (macOS 12.3.1 (21E258) - iMac18,3)
>
>     Cancel-Lock: sha1:Td+2MwxvrwXpMoggioJJMbqSdR0=                    \
>                  sha256:OVzsl0bFZRe8ztbKy3K5lwze9EBUmN29DL0/HTMK1LY=   \___ 
> This is not normal
> 	        sha1:H8zxdiknN5VL6cy1IDbFMe6TrQs=                     /
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_message
>
>     
> https://web.archive.org/web/20070502013009/http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-usefor-cancel-lock-01
>
>       "3.1  Adding an initial "Cancel-Lock: " header to a proto-article...  
> <=== Does not explain it
>
> Your client did not add excess cancel-locks to your complaint message.
>
> As a result, perhaps try posting via AIOE and see if the cancelbot and
> Rogue Server in the path, are damaging posts in that sequence
> as well (somehow). AIOE does not appear to be adding a
> Cancel-Lock header, and your posting might well survive.
>
> Info posted on your cancel itself.
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/fr.soc.politique/c/7O4QLZ9mM20/m/Omasx5f2AAAJ
>
>     Paul

I am not sure to understand excatly what you said.
I make a test to send a message from AIOE
It was cancelled by the miakibot to.

The rogue cancel message:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Path: 
aioe.org!news.alphanet.ch!alphanet.ch!miakibot!byreferences!cyberspam!not-for-mail
From: miakibot3 <[email protected]>
Organization: miakibot
Subject: cmsg cancel 
<uls57hta1s6esuhq50tat486a4estpq2et@consensus-omnium>
Control: cancel <uls57hta1s6esuhq50tat486a4estpq2et@consensus-omnium>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 23:42:15 +0200
Archive: No
X-No-Archive: Yes
Message-ID: 
<cancel.uls57hta1s6esuhq50tat486a4estpq2et@consensus-omnium>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Followup-To: poster
X-Original-From: LaLibreParole <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: fr.usenet.abus.d
X-Original-Subject: Re: La philosophie du cancel sur Usenet
X-Original-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 23:40:25 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID: 
<uls57hta1s6esuhq50tat486a4estpq2et@consensus-omnium>
Xref: aioe.org control.cancel:1582821

Response to a cancelled article (byreferences)
------------------------------------------------------------------------


I Think the problem is not the source message, or cancel-lock but
the acceptance of the rogue cancel from ALPHANET server,
The abusive user on this serveur is: "<[email protected]>"

But the ALPHANET server promote these rogues cancels.
This is why i write to server which newly accept these abusives
cancels of the miakibot2 or miakibot3.
Until April 29 or 30 "aioe" did not accept these cancels.
But now "aioe" accept them.
Plesae, stop to accept these rogues cancels.

sincerely yours,