Re: Federal judge rules Alabama city must allow gay pride float at Christmas parade

"Scout" <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:01:23 -0600
Newsgroups alt.law-enforcement.corruption,alabama.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.homosexuality
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> On 12/10/2024 7:06 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless 
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>
>>
>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> On 12/9/2024 8:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless 
>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "useapen" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>>> PRATTVILLE, Ala. -- A federal judge has ordered an Alabama city to 
>>>>> allow
>>>>> an LGBTQ+ pride group to participate in the city's Christmas parade on
>>>>> Friday, after the mayor initially blocked the group from the annual 
>>>>> event
>>>>> citing unspecified “safety concerns.”
>>>>>
>>>>> U.S. District Judge R. Austin Huffaker Jr. ruled that the City of
>>>>> Prattville violated Prattville Pride's First Amendment right to free
>>>>> speech and 14th Amendment right to equal protection under the law when 
>>>>> it
>>>>> banned the group from running a float in the annual Christmas parade 
>>>>> one
>>>>> day before the event was set to take place.
>>>>>
>>>>> “The City removed Prattville Pride from the parade based on its belief
>>>>> that certain members of the public who oppose Prattville Pride, and 
>>>>> what
>>>>> is stands for, would react in a disruptive way. But discrimination 
>>>>> based
>>>>> on a message’s content 'cannot be tolerated under the First 
>>>>> Amendment,' ”
>>>>> Huffaker wrote in his opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>> The ruling required the city to provide at least two police officers 
>>>>> to
>>>>> escort the float throughout the parade.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, but unless ALL floats get an escort of 2 police officers
>>>
>>> No, scooter. The other floats and parade entries are not at risk of 
>>> being attacked
>>
>> How would you know which floats are at risk?
>
> Because you haven't threatened violence against them, scooter.

Then the Pride float has no need for any officers because I've not 
threatened violence against them.

> But you did threaten violence against the LGBTQ float.

Cite, apologize or I may consider legal action against you as you are 
accusing me of a crime, in public, without a valid basis.