Re: Federal judge rules Alabama city must allow gay pride float at Christmas parade
"Scout" <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:01:23 -0600
| Newsgroups | alt.law-enforcement.corruption,alabama.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.homosexuality |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On 12/10/2024 7:06 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless > chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: > >> >> >> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >>> On 12/9/2024 8:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "useapen" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>> news:[email protected]... >>>> >>>>> PRATTVILLE, Ala. -- A federal judge has ordered an Alabama city to >>>>> allow >>>>> an LGBTQ+ pride group to participate in the city's Christmas parade on >>>>> Friday, after the mayor initially blocked the group from the annual >>>>> event >>>>> citing unspecified “safety concerns.” >>>>> >>>>> U.S. District Judge R. Austin Huffaker Jr. ruled that the City of >>>>> Prattville violated Prattville Pride's First Amendment right to free >>>>> speech and 14th Amendment right to equal protection under the law when >>>>> it >>>>> banned the group from running a float in the annual Christmas parade >>>>> one >>>>> day before the event was set to take place. >>>>> >>>>> “The City removed Prattville Pride from the parade based on its belief >>>>> that certain members of the public who oppose Prattville Pride, and >>>>> what >>>>> is stands for, would react in a disruptive way. But discrimination >>>>> based >>>>> on a message’s content 'cannot be tolerated under the First >>>>> Amendment,' ” >>>>> Huffaker wrote in his opinion. >>>>> >>>>> The ruling required the city to provide at least two police officers >>>>> to >>>>> escort the float throughout the parade. >>>> >>>> I'm sorry, but unless ALL floats get an escort of 2 police officers >>> >>> No, scooter. The other floats and parade entries are not at risk of >>> being attacked >> >> How would you know which floats are at risk? > > Because you haven't threatened violence against them, scooter. Then the Pride float has no need for any officers because I've not threatened violence against them. > But you did threaten violence against the LGBTQ float. Cite, apologize or I may consider legal action against you as you are accusing me of a crime, in public, without a valid basis.