Re: Federal judge rules Alabama city must allow gay pride float at Christmas parade
Klaus Schadenfreude <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Dec 2024 11:31:54 -0800
| Newsgroups | alt.law-enforcement.corruption,alabama.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.homosexuality |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/10/2024 10:01 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: > > > "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> On 12/10/2024 7:06 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >> >>> >>> >>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>> news:[email protected]... >>>> On 12/9/2024 8:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "useapen" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>> >>>>>> PRATTVILLE, Ala. -- A federal judge has ordered an Alabama city to allow >>>>>> an LGBTQ+ pride group to participate in the city's Christmas parade on >>>>>> Friday, after the mayor initially blocked the group from the annual event >>>>>> citing unspecified “safety concerns.” >>>>>> >>>>>> U.S. District Judge R. Austin Huffaker Jr. ruled that the City of >>>>>> Prattville violated Prattville Pride's First Amendment right to free >>>>>> speech and 14th Amendment right to equal protection under the law when it >>>>>> banned the group from running a float in the annual Christmas parade one >>>>>> day before the event was set to take place. >>>>>> >>>>>> “The City removed Prattville Pride from the parade based on its belief >>>>>> that certain members of the public who oppose Prattville Pride, and what >>>>>> is stands for, would react in a disruptive way. But discrimination based >>>>>> on a message’s content 'cannot be tolerated under the First Amendment,' ” >>>>>> Huffaker wrote in his opinion. >>>>>> >>>>>> The ruling required the city to provide at least two police officers to >>>>>> escort the float throughout the parade. >>>>> >>>>> I'm sorry, but unless ALL floats get an escort of 2 police officers >>>> >>>> No, scooter. The other floats and parade entries are not at risk of being >>>> attacked >>> >>> How would you know which floats are at risk? >> >> Because you haven't threatened violence against them, scooter. > > Then the Pride float has no need for any officers because I've not threatened > violence against them. Your fellow Nazis have, scooter, so yes, "you" have threatened that float.