Re: Federal judge rules Alabama city must allow gay pride float at Christmas parade

On 12/11/2024 11:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless 
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

> 
> 
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 12/10/2024 10:01 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless 
>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> On 12/10/2024 7:06 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless 
>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> On 12/9/2024 8:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless 
>>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "useapen" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> PRATTVILLE, Ala. -- A federal judge has ordered an Alabama city to allow
>>>>>>>> an LGBTQ+ pride group to participate in the city's Christmas parade on
>>>>>>>> Friday, after the mayor initially blocked the group from the annual event
>>>>>>>> citing unspecified “safety concerns.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> U.S. District Judge R. Austin Huffaker Jr. ruled that the City of
>>>>>>>> Prattville violated Prattville Pride's First Amendment right to free
>>>>>>>> speech and 14th Amendment right to equal protection under the law when it
>>>>>>>> banned the group from running a float in the annual Christmas parade one
>>>>>>>> day before the event was set to take place.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> “The City removed Prattville Pride from the parade based on its belief
>>>>>>>> that certain members of the public who oppose Prattville Pride, and what
>>>>>>>> is stands for, would react in a disruptive way. But discrimination based
>>>>>>>> on a message’s content 'cannot be tolerated under the First Amendment,' ”
>>>>>>>> Huffaker wrote in his opinion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The ruling required the city to provide at least two police officers to
>>>>>>>> escort the float throughout the parade.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm sorry, but unless ALL floats get an escort of 2 police officers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, scooter. The other floats and parade entries are not at risk of being 
>>>>>> attacked
>>>>>
>>>>> How would you know which floats are at risk?
>>>>
>>>> Because you haven't threatened violence against them, scooter.
>>>
>>> Then the Pride float has no need for any officers because I've not threatened 
>>> violence against them.
>>
>> Your fellow Nazis have, scooter, so yes, "you" have threatened that float.
> 
> So you lied

No, scooter.

> when you asserted that I threatened them.

Your fellow KKK thugs threatened them, scooter. That's *you* and your thugs, 
scooter. You're part of that mob, scooter.