Re: Federal judge rules Alabama city must allow gay pride float at Christmas parade

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> On 12/10/2024 11:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless 
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>
>>
>> "Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:06:21 -0600, "Scout"
>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>> On 12/9/2024 8:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>> "useapen" <[email protected]> wrote
>>> <snip>
>>>>>>> The ruling required the city to provide at least two police officers 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> escort the float throughout the parade.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm sorry, but unless ALL floats get an escort of 2 police officers
>>>>>
>>>>> No, scooter. The other floats and parade entries are not at risk of 
>>>>> being
>>>>> attacked
>>>>
>>>> How would you know which floats are at risk?
>>>>
>>>> Beside, the issue isn't the risk.. it's the DISCRIMINATION.
>>>>
>>>> I mean don't ALL floats deserve a police escort?
>>>>
>>>> Why should THIS float get such a special honor?
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like discrimination.
>>>>
>>>> See, they don't mind discrimination, they just want discrimination to 
>>>> favor
>>>> them.
>>>
>>> Why should low crime areas get police protection?  They don't need it. 
>>> They
>>> don't have crime.
>>
>> Are you suggest [sic] a parade float is a "high crime area"?
> No, scooter, he's not "suggest" that. But that one float is at *known* 
> risk for attack by you and your mob.

Please produce your evidence that float is at a "known" risk of attack from 
my or any mobs of mine.

Further if they are in such danger maybe they should stay home or hire 
private security. After all the police have no obligation to protect anyone, 
nor to provide any special protection to anyone.

I mean you do know that the Supreme Court has ruled time and time again that 
the police have NO obligation to protect any specific individual(s) from 
crime as their obligation is only to the community as a whole. This has been 
ruled on in multiple cases and as such, the police are under no obligation 
to provide special protection for that float. Indeed, if they did so, all 
the other floats could claim they were being discriminated against as they 
are not being provided with the same level of protection. We all know how 
much you hate discrimination in any form (other than those you approve of).