Re: Federal judge rules Alabama city must allow gay pride float at Christmas parade

On 12/26/2024 3:57 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless 
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

> 
> 
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 12/26/2024 9:08 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless 
>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> On 12/25/2024 11:28 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless 
>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> On 12/10/2024 11:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless 
>>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:06:21 -0600, "Scout"
>>>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/9/2024 8:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>>>>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>> "useapen" <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The ruling required the city to provide at least two police officers to
>>>>>>>>>>>> escort the float throughout the parade.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry, but unless ALL floats get an escort of 2 police officers
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, scooter. The other floats and parade entries are not at risk of being
>>>>>>>>>> attacked
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How would you know which floats are at risk?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Beside, the issue isn't the risk.. it's the DISCRIMINATION.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I mean don't ALL floats deserve a police escort?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why should THIS float get such a special honor?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sounds like discrimination.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> See, they don't mind discrimination, they just want discrimination to 
>>>>>>>>> favor
>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why should low crime areas get police protection?  They don't need it. They
>>>>>>>> don't have crime.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you suggest [sic] a parade float is a "high crime area"?
>>>>>> No, scooter, he's not "suggest" that. But that one float is at *known* 
>>>>>> risk for attack by you and your mob.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please produce your evidence that float is at a "known" risk of attack from 
>>>>> my or any mobs of mine.
>>>>
>>>> The police department already did that. Ask them.
>>>
>>> Apparently they didn't
>>
>> They did, scooter.
>>
>>> or they would automatically provide protection.
>>
>> No, scooter. The city *denied* the float organizers a permit for the float 
>> because of the city's determination that the float might incite a violent 
>> attack by your fellows.
> 
> Well,

Another scooterism: empty meaningless wheeze

> let's say this is the case, though I doubt it.

It is the case, scooter.

> If something is going to 
> cause or incite public violence/danger then it is well within the authority of 
> the local government to refuse permits/permission so as to prevent such 
> violence/danger.

The city may not try to mitigate the risk of violence by refusing to issue a 
permit to one group, scooter. Instead, scooter, the court ruled the city must 
offer extra protection to the targeted group, to prevent your fellow Nazis from 
committing violence against them.

> Further

Another scooterism: empty meaningless wheeze

> the local government has no obligation to go to any efforts to change 
> the situation.

The court ruled otherwise, scooter. You're not a lawyer, scooter, and you know 
the law far *less* than the average non-lawyer.