Re: Stopping the boats
Mike Fleming <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.2eggs.sausage.beans.tomatoes.2toast.largetea.cheerslove |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04/06/2024 21:05, Citizen Smith wrote: > > It seems to the very naive me that if the French would just take them back then > the trafficking would stop in a heartbeat because there'd be no point in it. Am > I missing something? Is this not being suggested anywhere because the French > don't want them back and we don't want to upset them? It used to be that they did take them back because the UK was part of the Dublin Agreement which said they could be taken back. Since a load of idiots voted for Brexit, the UK is no longer in the Dublin agreement, so as any asylum seekers crossing in boats could no longer be sent back to France, all of a sudden that's how they started coming over. A vote for Brexit was a vote for small boats. Incidentally, most asylum claims are allowed, most of those that aren't and are appealed are subsequently allowed, and there's over 50 times as many immigrants coming in on visas as there are small boat refugees. But never mind, as long as the twenty or thirty thousand poor bastards risking drowning by crossing the Channel can be blamed for the collapse of the NHS, the shortage of housing, the crumbling schools, the cost of living crisis, etc, then politicians will want them coming in as a distraction.