Re: ressearch on semi permanent voice

marika <[email protected]> wrote:
> marika <[email protected]> wrote:
>> marika <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> marika <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> marika <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> As the days go on, the more I see of these trump Ukraine peace headlines,
>>>>> the more enraged I get.
>>>>> And especially enraged that idiot trump really thinks he is offering  some
>>>>> kind of “deal”.
>>>>> 
>>>>> “Give us everything we want, every single thing we started this war for,
>>>>> and even though after almost 4years we’re still not winning this
>>>>> thing….just give it all to us anyway, and you get nothing”
>>>>> 
>>>>> That’s not even how WARS work, let alone DEALS.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Before the election his advisors all said he would have no trouble with
>>>> this issue
>>>> 
>>>> This very much reminds me of when gwb was told about iraq being an easy
>>>> win, that people would come out thanking him for disposing of saddam,
>>>> telling him about nonexistent wmds 
>>>> 
>>>> This is the exact same thing but with better social media 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I worry that Zelensky/ukraine signed this, in desperation just in the hopes
>>> that trump will “like” Ukraine better, because of it. Because normal people
>>> DO “like” people who treat them well, right?
>>> If that’s the (only?) reason, than Ukraine is in for a heap of even more
>>> bad trouble down the line. Because we all know how much trump “likes”
>>> anyone who agrees to be ripped off by him. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://x.com/amanpour/status/1894822688197079340?s=61&t=ZCHyRu4DjWNZf_cm3_DB6A
>>> 
>>> Christiane Amanpour
>>> ⁦‪@amanpour‬⁩
>>> 
>>> 
>>> “It’s total extortion.” Former UK Defense Secretary ⁦‪@BenWallace70‬⁩ is
>>> scathing about the US-Ukraine minerals deal. “What is Zelensky getting for
>>> it?” 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2/26/25, 1:51 PM
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> You know what I was thinking today about the election(s)?
>> 1) what an incredibly different time we’d be living in right now, if Hilary
>> had won in 2016
>> 2) trump had been saying since 2020 (including in his speech at the ellipse
>> on Jan6) that if Biden wins we “won’t have a country anymore”. Am I the
>> only one who remembers that he said that, and noticed that we still have a
>> country?
>> 3) and I honestly think we might have been better off (just a little bit)
>> if trump had won in 2020. Because he was already in office and still didnt
>> have all the gears set up, like he’s had for the past 4 years, to prepare
>> to destroy the country. And there were still normal-ish people in his admin
>> and the government, the media hadn’t been terrorized yet, maga was a cult
>> but they weren’t so powerful yet, neither were the oligarchs involved yet,
>> and trump didn’t have absolute fealty yet then.  There would have been no
>> J6 and no total immunity from scotus, because there’d be no court cases
>> until after he left office.
>> The only problem is he’d probably have figured out by now how to run for a
>> third term.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Happy new year.
> 
> 
> Because our family in Ukraine now goes along with the recent European Union
> mandated change to enhance uniformity. We celebrated the 25th. I did not do
> anything special other than face time when the youngsters opened gifts.
> 
> I did go to Maine again.
> 
> 

I think Trump wants a coronation

the person doing the crowning has to be of higher status, i think, like a
pope.  But since Trump isn’t a catholic, it won’t work. So the question is
who does he look up,to, who he would agree to crowning him

It wouldn’t be putin, since trump views himself as putin’s equal


It will be a stunt and he doesn’t care
But he will do it for sure