Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed
"Andrew" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 01:42:50 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Organization | usenet-news.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Andrew wrote: >> "Dawn Flood" wrote: >>> Andrew wrote: >>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote: >>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>>> "Attila" wrote: >>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not possible, except in the realm of fantasy. But >>>>>>>> for those who want the truth, science will always >>>>>>>> be the way to go, and not unscientific fantasy! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am constantly amused by how you insist anything involving >>>>>>> your silly superstition is based on science yet anything in >>>>>>> the arena of possible scientific investigation is fantasy. >>>>>> >>>>>> You obviously don't know the difference between >>>>>> "possible science"(fantasy) and "empirical science". >>>>> >>>>> What conservation laws would be violated if an organic, self- replicating molecule >>>>> would be artificially synthesized? >>>> >>>> You're saying that it is "artificially synthesized", rather than, "naturally synthesized". >>>> Therefore you acknowledge that a high *Intelligence* was involved in its Creation. >>>> >>>> Thank you, Dawn! >>>> Do you get the picture now? >>>> >>>>> By the way, have you ever heard of "artificial selection"? >>>> >>>> Yeah. >>>> >>>>> Why do you think that natural selection, which took eons, >>>> >>>> Could 'natural selection' explain our origins? No, because >>>> 'natural selection' can only select from .that which *already* >>>> exists. >>> >>> Yeah, sure, artificial selection involves intelligence (humans), which is why it can happen so very quickly: >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_breed >>> >>> The domestic dog is the first species, and the only large carnivore, to have been domesticated. The first dogs were certainly >>> wolflike, but the phenotypic changes that coincided with the dog–wolf genetic divergence are not known.[15] Dogs are the most >>> variable mammal on earth with around 450 globally recognized dog breeds.[2] In the Victorian era, directed human selection >>> developed the modern dog breeds, which resulted in a vast range of phenotypes.[15] Most breeds were derived from small numbers >>> of founders within the last 200 years, [15][2] and since then dogs have undergone rapid phenotypic change and were formed into >>> today's modern breeds due to artificial selection imposed by humans. >>> >>> And, so, yes, with an intelligent agent, evolution can happen very quickly! >> >> That's speciation rather than evolution. They all >> came from the original dog 'kind' at the Creation >> (Gen 1:24-25). >> >> They started with dogs, and ended up with dogs. >> >> That's all! >> >>> Now, why did it take God >> >> You finally concede He is. >> >>> 4.5 billion years to guide evolution to the Dawn >>> of Humanity? How about the "boring billion": >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boring_Billion >> >> What you cite is called 'unscientific fantasy', >> >> Someone conjured it up in their imagination, >> and you fell for it. >> >>> Why the "slow biological evolution"?? What >>> was God doing during all of this time??! >>> >>> Dawn >> >> Rather why were you so gullible to believe that? > > How old is the Earth, Andrew? Universe? You won't answer, will > you? Of course, others have asked you this question ad nauseam. ___________________________________________________ Notice folks, that our friend here Dawn, has just pulled a ~~"Red Herring"! Which is a logical fallacy used by those who try to argue -against- the truth!. She is unable to logically address the above post, so she attempts to use a 'Red Herring' to extricate herself from her embarrassing, foolish position. ____________________________________________________ What is a red herring logical fallacy? A red herring is a misleading statement, question, or argument meant to redirect a conversation away from its original topic. In a debate, a participant might use a red herring to avoid discussing a topic for which they don’t have a well-developed position or if their position could make them look bad (https://www.grammarly.com/blog/rhetorical-devices/red-herring-fallacy/)