Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

"Attila" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> "Andrew" wrote:
>>"Samuel Spade"wrote:
>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>> "Samuel Spade" wrote:
>>>> > Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>> >> Andrew wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > And what they did, is in your body, Dawn!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> And, so, if a group of scientists would succeed in synthesizing a
>>>> >> self-replicating molecule from inorganic matter, are you then going to
>>>> >> claim that they were divinely, yet unknowingly, inspired??
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Dawn
>>>> >
>>>> > Andrew would claim that, since the scientists are alive, it's
>>>> > life from existing life and therefore not abiogenesis.  Even
>>>> > though the ingredients are all inorganic.
>>>>
>>>> No, the_only_way they could make life, is by having their
>>>> own children. Through the natural process that was put in
>>>> to place when we were created, by our most awesome, and
>>>> most wonderful Creator----> God.
>>>
>>> I'm afraid you're mistaken.  Life will be abiogenesized in
>>> the lab, probably soon, by the most ~awesome~ creator,
>>> ----> science!
>>
>>Science has already spoken on this. "Law of Biogenesis".
>
> That does not address the origin of life.
>
> AI Overview                 The biogenetic law states that
> ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny-meaning an organism's
> growth (ontogeny) replays the evolutionary history of its
> species (phylogeny). Proposed in 1866 by Ernst Haeckel, it
> suggests embryos pass through the adult stages of ancient
> ancestors.

That was Haeckel's theory, but it has since been totally 
discredited. Therefore in the real world,  there is -->no 
such thing as,"The biogenic law". Haeckel admitted to 
having fraudulently altered his diagrams to support his 
theory. Which has long been discredited by embryologists..

And unfortunately, because of your 'gullibility', you
have been- ---> DECEIVED <-----.!!!    

_________________________________________


>>> If life were created by an AI program, would you say it was
>>> still created by humans?
>>
>>It would tell us that intelligence was required. Thus proving...
>>
>>                                      ~ ID ~