Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed
Vincent Maycock <[email protected]> Wed, 05 Aug 2026 15:18:53 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 5 Aug 2026 11:17:26 -0700, "Andrew" <[email protected]> wrote: >"Vincent Maycock" wrote in message news:[email protected]... > ><<>> > >> the fossil record is quite suggestive of evolution. > >Here Vince admits, it is only "suggestive". No, not "only" suggestive, "quite" suggestive. How would you feel if someone said that the evidence is quite suggestive that you are pedophile? >Yet he believes >~as if~ it were the actual TRUTH. That appears to be what it is, yeah. >Vince is a "believer" along with the gullible masses >who don's think for themselves, but simply believe >what they were told. I was raised a creationist, and was told what to believe by my creationist family. When I got into my teens, I thought for myself and concluded that the YEC position was scientifically untenable, and upset their little apple cart. >> Notable examples of this include... > >Now he is going to provide evidence of his gullibility >by citing, not science, but what someone fantasized How can you be so sure that it's "fantasized"? Just because it demolishes your religion? Maybe it's your religion that's fantasized, and the science is right! > in some book that he read! Books, plural. I've been interested in fossils (specifically vertebrate paleontology) since I was a teen-ager. >> mammal-like reptiles (intermediate in >> form between mammals and reptiles), australopithecines and other >> ancient hominids intermediate between apes and humans, ichthyostegids >> intermediate between fish and amphibians, _Basilosaurus_ intermediate >> between whales and land animals, dinosaurs intermediate between >> reptiles and birds, seymouriamorphs intermediate between amphibians >> and reptiles, and_Hyracotherium_ intermediate between horses and early >> perissodactyls. > >Vince would not write the above unless he believed that it were >fact. When in fact it is not 'fact' but rather only fantasy. Thus he >reveals his gullibility. You're not going to try to refute even one of the proofs of evolution found in the list I provided above? Just sweep them under the rug while ranting about gullibility and fantasy?