Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed
Dawn Flood <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Aug 2026 20:48:37 -0500
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/4/2026 3:42 AM, Andrew wrote: > "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:[email protected]... >> Andrew wrote: >>> "Dawn Flood" wrote: >>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote: >>>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>>>> "Attila" wrote: >>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not possible, except in the realm of fantasy. But >>>>>>>>> for those who want the truth, science will always >>>>>>>>> be the way to go, and not unscientific fantasy! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am constantly amused by how you insist anything involving >>>>>>>> your silly superstition is based on science yet anything in >>>>>>>> the arena of possible scientific investigation is fantasy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You obviously don't know the difference between >>>>>>> "possible science"(fantasy) and "empirical science". >>>>>> >>>>>> What conservation laws would be violated if an organic, self- >>>>>> replicating molecule >>>>>> would be artificially synthesized? >>>>> >>>>> You're saying that it is "artificially synthesized", rather than, >>>>> "naturally synthesized". >>>>> Therefore you acknowledge that a high *Intelligence* was involved >>>>> in its Creation. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, Dawn! >>>>> Do you get the picture now? >>>>> >>>>>> By the way, have you ever heard of "artificial selection"? >>>>> >>>>> Yeah. >>>>> >>>>>> Why do you think that natural selection, which took eons, >>>>> >>>>> Could 'natural selection' explain our origins? No, because >>>>> 'natural selection' can only select from .that which *already* >>>>> exists. >>>> >>>> Yeah, sure, artificial selection involves intelligence (humans), >>>> which is why it can happen so very quickly: >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_breed >>>> >>>> The domestic dog is the first species, and the only large carnivore, >>>> to have been domesticated. The first dogs were certainly >>>> wolflike, but the phenotypic changes that coincided with the dog– >>>> wolf genetic divergence are not known.[15] Dogs are the most >>>> variable mammal on earth with around 450 globally recognized dog >>>> breeds.[2] In the Victorian era, directed human selection >>>> developed the modern dog breeds, which resulted in a vast range of >>>> phenotypes.[15] Most breeds were derived from small numbers >>>> of founders within the last 200 years, [15][2] and since then dogs >>>> have undergone rapid phenotypic change and were formed into >>>> today's modern breeds due to artificial selection imposed by humans. >>>> >>>> And, so, yes, with an intelligent agent, evolution can happen very >>>> quickly! >>> >>> That's speciation rather than evolution. They all >>> came from the original dog 'kind' at the Creation >>> (Gen 1:24-25). >>> >>> They started with dogs, and ended up with dogs. >>> >>> That's all! >>> >>>> Now, why did it take God >>> >>> You finally concede He is. >>> >>>> 4.5 billion years to guide evolution to the Dawn >>>> of Humanity? How about the "boring billion": >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boring_Billion >>> >>> What you cite is called 'unscientific fantasy', >>> >>> Someone conjured it up in their imagination, >>> and you fell for it. >>> >>>> Why the "slow biological evolution"?? What >>>> was God doing during all of this time??! >>>> >>>> Dawn >>> >>> Rather why were you so gullible to believe that? >> >> How old is the Earth, Andrew? Universe? You won't answer, will >> you? Of course, others have asked you this question ad nauseam. > ___________________________________________________ > > Notice folks, that our friend here Dawn, has just pulled a ~~"Red Herring"! > > Which is a logical fallacy used by those who try to argue -against- the > truth!. > > She is unable to logically address the above post, so she attempts to use a > 'Red Herring' to extricate herself from her embarrassing, foolish > position. > ____________________________________________________ > > What is a red herring logical fallacy? > > A red herring is a misleading statement, question, or argument meant to > redirect a conversation away from its original topic. > > In a debate, a participant might use a red herring to avoid discussing a > topic for which they don’t have a well-developed position or if their > position could make them look bad > > (https://www.grammarly.com/blog/rhetorical-devices/red-herring-fallacy/) > Andrew, Honey, it's just a simple question! Just give a number for each! He are mine: Age of the Earth: 4.54 billion Age of the Universe: 13.8 billion See, that was easy!! Dawn P.S. Now, if you ask me for my skirt size, that is not so easy! (Really, it just "depends".)