Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

Dawn Flood <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Aug 2026 20:48:37 -0500
Newsgroups alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/4/2026 3:42 AM, Andrew wrote:
> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> Andrew wrote:
>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not possible, except in the realm of fantasy. But
>>>>>>>>> for those who want the truth, science will always
>>>>>>>>> be the way to go, and not unscientific fantasy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am constantly amused by how you insist anything involving
>>>>>>>> your silly superstition is based on science yet anything in
>>>>>>>> the arena of possible scientific investigation is fantasy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You obviously don't know the difference between
>>>>>>> "possible science"(fantasy) and "empirical science".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What conservation laws would be violated if an organic, self- 
>>>>>> replicating molecule
>>>>>>  would be artificially synthesized?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're saying that it is "artificially synthesized", rather than, 
>>>>> "naturally synthesized".
>>>>> Therefore you acknowledge that a high *Intelligence* was involved 
>>>>> in its Creation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you, Dawn!
>>>>> Do you get the picture now?
>>>>>
>>>>>> By the way, have you ever heard of "artificial selection"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you think that natural selection, which took eons,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could 'natural selection' explain our origins? No, because
>>>>> 'natural selection' can only select from .that which *already*
>>>>> exists.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, sure, artificial selection involves intelligence (humans), 
>>>> which is why it can happen so very quickly:
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_breed
>>>>
>>>> The domestic dog is the first species, and the only large carnivore, 
>>>> to have been domesticated. The first dogs were certainly
>>>> wolflike, but the phenotypic changes that coincided with the dog– 
>>>> wolf genetic divergence are not known.[15] Dogs are the most
>>>> variable mammal on earth with around 450 globally recognized dog 
>>>> breeds.[2] In the Victorian era, directed human selection
>>>> developed the modern dog breeds, which resulted in a vast range of 
>>>> phenotypes.[15] Most breeds were derived from small numbers
>>>> of founders within the last 200 years, [15][2] and since then dogs 
>>>> have undergone rapid phenotypic change and were formed into
>>>> today's modern breeds due to artificial selection imposed by humans.
>>>>
>>>> And, so, yes, with an intelligent agent, evolution can happen very 
>>>> quickly!
>>>
>>> That's speciation rather than evolution. They all
>>> came from the original dog 'kind' at the Creation
>>> (Gen 1:24-25).
>>>
>>> They started with dogs, and ended up with dogs.
>>>
>>> That's all!
>>>
>>>> Now, why did it take God
>>>
>>> You finally concede He is.
>>>
>>>> 4.5 billion years to guide evolution to the Dawn
>>>>  of Humanity? How about the "boring billion":
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boring_Billion
>>>
>>> What you cite is called 'unscientific fantasy',
>>>
>>> Someone conjured it up in their imagination,
>>> and you fell for it.
>>>
>>>>  Why the "slow biological evolution"?? What
>>>>  was God doing during all of this time??!
>>>>
>>>> Dawn
>>>
>>> Rather why were you so gullible to believe that?
>>
>> How old is the Earth, Andrew?  Universe?  You won't answer, will
>> you? Of course, others have asked you this question ad nauseam.
> ___________________________________________________
> 
> Notice folks, that our friend here Dawn, has just pulled a ~~"Red Herring"!
> 
> Which is a logical fallacy used by those who try to argue -against- the 
> truth!.
> 
> She is unable to logically address the above post, so she attempts to use a
> 'Red Herring' to extricate herself from her embarrassing, foolish  
> position.
> ____________________________________________________
> 
> What is a red herring logical fallacy?
> 
> A red herring is a misleading statement, question, or argument meant to
> redirect a conversation away from its original topic.
> 
> In a debate, a participant might use a red herring to avoid discussing a
> topic for which they don’t have a well-developed position or if their
> position could make them look bad
> 
> (https://www.grammarly.com/blog/rhetorical-devices/red-herring-fallacy/)
> 

Andrew, Honey, it's just a simple question!  Just give a number for each!

He are mine:

Age of the Earth:  4.54 billion
Age of the Universe:  13.8 billion

See, that was easy!!

Dawn

P.S.  Now, if you ask me for my skirt size, that is not so easy! 
(Really, it just "depends".)