Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

"Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Andrew wrote:
>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not possible, except in the realm of fantasy. But
>>>>>>>>>> for those who want the truth, science will always
>>>>>>>>>> be the way to go, and not unscientific fantasy!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am constantly amused by how you insist anything involving
>>>>>>>>> your silly superstition is based on science yet anything in
>>>>>>>>> the arena of possible scientific investigation is fantasy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You obviously don't know the difference between
>>>>>>>> "possible science"(fantasy) and "empirical science".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What conservation laws would be violated if an organic, self- replicating molecule
>>>>>>> would be artificially synthesized?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're saying that it is "artificially synthesized", rather than, "naturally synthesized".
>>>>>> Therefore you acknowledge that a high *Intelligence* was involved in its Creation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you, Dawn!
>>>>>> Do you get the picture now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By the way, have you ever heard of "artificial selection"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why do you think that natural selection, which took eons,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could 'natural selection' explain our origins? No, because
>>>>>> 'natural selection' can only select from .that which *already*
>>>>>> exists.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, sure, artificial selection involves intelligence (humans), which is why it can happen so very quickly:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_breed
>>>>>
>>>>> The domestic dog is the first species, and the only large carnivore, to have been domesticated. The first dogs were certainly
>>>>> wolflike, but the phenotypic changes that coincided with the dog– wolf genetic divergence are not known.[15] Dogs are the most
>>>>> variable mammal on earth with around 450 globally recognized dog breeds.[2] In the Victorian era, directed human selection
>>>>> developed the modern dog breeds, which resulted in a vast range of phenotypes.[15] Most breeds were derived from small numbers
>>>>> of founders within the last 200 years, [15][2] and since then dogs have undergone rapid phenotypic change and were formed into
>>>>> today's modern breeds due to artificial selection imposed by humans.
>>>>>
>>>>> And, so, yes, with an intelligent agent, evolution can happen very quickly!
>>>>
>>>> That's speciation rather than evolution. They all
>>>> came from the original dog 'kind' at the Creation
>>>> (Gen 1:24-25).
>>>>
>>>> They started with dogs, and ended up with dogs.
>>>>
>>>> That's all!
>>>>
>>>>> Now, why did it take God
>>>>
>>>> You finally concede He is.
>>>>
>>>>> 4.5 billion years to guide evolution to the Dawn
>>>>> of Humanity? How about the "boring billion":
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boring_Billion
>>>>
>>>> What you cite is called 'unscientific fantasy',
>>>>
>>>> Someone conjured it up in their imagination,
>>>> and you fell for it.
>>>>
>>>>> Why the "slow biological evolution"?? What
>>>>> was God doing during all of this time??!
>>>>>
>>>>> Dawn
>>>>
>>>> Rather why were you so gullible to believe that?
>>>
>>> How old is the Earth, Andrew? Universe? You won't answer, will
>>> you? Of course, others have asked you this question ad nauseam.
>> ___________________________________________________
>>
>> Notice folks, that our friend here Dawn, has just pulled a ~~"Red Herring"!
>>
>> Which is a logical fallacy used by those who try to argue -against- the truth!.
>>
>> She is unable to logically address the above post, so she attempts to use a
>> 'Red Herring' to extricate herself from her embarrassing, foolish  position.
>> ____________________________________________________
>>
>> What is a red herring logical fallacy?
>>
>> A red herring is a misleading statement, question, or argument meant to
>> redirect a conversation away from its original topic.
>>
>> In a debate, a participant might use a red herring to avoid discussing a
>> topic for which they don’t have a well-developed position or if their
>> position could make them look bad
>>
>> (https://www.grammarly.com/blog/rhetorical-devices/red-herring-fallacy/)
>>
>
> Andrew, Honey, it's just a simple question!  Just give a number for each!
>
> He are mine:
>
> Age of the Earth:  4.54 billion
> Age of the Universe:  13.8 billion
>
> See, that was easy!!

Since you claim to already know, why do you ask
me?

I have answered the ''age of the earth'' here many
times.

As to the "age of the Universe",  This will help

         ---> https://tinyurl.com/jatk6nw8


> Dawn
>
> P.S.  Now, if you ask me for my skirt size, that is not so easy! (Really, it just "depends".)

Now please tell us. What is your weight and height?

Thank you.


Peace.