Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Scrutiny <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.abortion,alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.democrats.d,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Phil Omdahl <jaques.idiot.pal@number1> wrote in news:[email protected]: > On 8/24/2026 12:48 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, > convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted > another content-free batch of lies: >> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>> >>> On 8/24/2026 12:28 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off >>> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking >>> do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies: >>>> In article <gI%[email protected]>, >>>> I'M-SURE-I'M-A-FUCKING- [email protected] says... >>>>> >>>>> On 8/24/2026 11:02 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off >>>>> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking >>>>> do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies: >>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>> [email protected] says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Andrew" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> "Ubiquitous" wrote >>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "Alan" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> All evidence tells us that our origins has been the result >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> ----- >>>> an intelligent causation <<<<. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What "evidence"? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Start with a single example. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ~~~~ DNA ~~~~ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bullshit. That is *NOT* "evidence" >>>>>>>>> of intelligent design or "creation." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Highly specified instructions written in a >>>>>>>> digital code format, in a DNA molecule >>>>>>>> would be evidence that some intelligent >>>>>>>> Agency was involved. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You mean, "Look! DNA! Therefore, Goddidit!" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, that's just as nonsensical today as it was yesterday. >>>>>>> Don't you have anything better? A Chick tract or something? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yet you have no other explaination. >>>>> >>>>> *You* have no explanation that stands up to any scrutiny. >>>> >>>> You admit you have none. >>> >>> You're the one who claims to have one, and you don't. >> >> Again you admit you have no answer proving me right. > > No. Whenever you say that your opponent — your better in every way > — "admits" something, you're lying. There is never any such > "admission." > > *You* have no explanation that stands up to any scrutiny. "You're full of shit".