Re: In other news

BeH <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 18.07.2023 13.24, Merlyne wrote:
> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
> 
>> On 12.07.2023 13.22, Merlyne wrote:
>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in
>>> news:[email protected]: 
>>>
>>>> On 08.07.2023 17.01, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>> news:[email protected]: 
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05.07.2023 14.14, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 02.07.2023 16.29, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 28.06.2023 13.31, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I got a new phone and a better plan.
>>>>>>>>>>> Why are cell plans so much more expensive in my country vs
>>>>>>>>>>> the US? 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> CAPITALISM! It's always capitalism. We've been over this.
>>>>>>>>> Sure. Are you sure that it's not related to population base?
>>>>>>>> If you pay the same country-wide and you the same coverage in
>>>>>>>> sparsely populated areas (I know you have some of those), then
>>>>>>>> maybe. But most likely capitalism.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ugh!
>>>>>>>>>>> I got a new S21 and 20GB of data for $47/month taxes in.
>>>>>>>>>> I pay a base fee of ~$4/month (deducted from consumption) with
>>>>>>>>>> slightly higher per-minute charge and no free data. But then I
>>>>>>>>>> only use data in emergency (which haven't happened yet) and
>>>>>>>>>> make maybe two calls and two texts/month.
>>>>>>>>> I used to have a prepaid cell for like $10 a month back in 2003
>>>>>>>>> when it was my emergency phone.
>>>>>>>>> Once I started using it all the time, it was more
>>>>>>>>> cost-efficient to have a plan with unlimited talk and text. I
>>>>>>>>> would say that I am most frequently contacted by text than by
>>>>>>>>> other modes i.e. voice call or email. 
>>>>>>>>>> On the other hand I still pay for a landline (IP) even though
>>>>>>>>>> it hasn't made a sound (or call) in several years.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I also have a landline. My Dad calls it and a few places where
>>>>>>>>> I keep forgetting to change my contact info to my cell. I think
>>>>>>>>> the landline isn't VOIP it's whatever came before that but
>>>>>>>>> after rotary dial phones. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Analog... (rotary dials relied on counting the impulses - one
>>>>>>>> for each digit passed on return; pushbutton 'dialing' relied on
>>>>>>>> the frequency of the tone correspondig to each digit/button)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They will probably phase it out eventually.
>>>>>>>> Like they did with teevee signals, thus making everyone get new
>>>>>>>> teevees... 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I thought I got a new tv because the old one stopped working.
>>>>>> That may be, but lots of people got new tvs because their old one
>>>>>> couldn't receive/decode the digital signal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The cable company gave out digital conversion boxes to people.
>>>> Can you still get one of those. To use on an old teevee that you buy
>>>> at an antique shop?
>>>>
>>> I doubt anything would work on a tv that old.
>> In theory it would. It would require a digital to analog conversion
>> and probably a granularity reduction from HD to PAL or [whatever the
>> American format is called]. An old cable converter might just work if
>> one could bypass the subscription bit.
> 
> It could work from an antenna. Some channels are in the air. In HD even.
That's what I meant, using the antenna as input for the box. A really
old TV will probably make a mess of an unaltered HD signal.

>>>> People without a cable subscription didn't get any, I'll bet.
>>>>
>>> Probably not. No one is that nice.
>> Especially not cable companies.
>>
> 

-- 
BeH

" We are trapped by language to such a degree that every attempt to
formulate insight is a play on words." - Niels Bohr
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.