Re: In other news

Merlyne <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
BeH <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: 

> On 22.07.2023 17.21, Merlyne wrote:
>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]: 
>> 
>>> On 18.07.2023 13.24, Merlyne wrote:
>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>> news:[email protected]: 
>>>>
>>>>> On 12.07.2023 13.22, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>> news:[email protected]: 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 08.07.2023 17.01, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 05.07.2023 14.14, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 02.07.2023 16.29, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 28.06.2023 13.31, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I got a new phone and a better plan.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are cell plans so much more expensive in my country
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs the US? 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CAPITALISM! It's always capitalism. We've been over this.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. Are you sure that it's not related to population
>>>>>>>>>>>> base? 
>>>>>>>>>>> If you pay the same country-wide and you the same coverage
>>>>>>>>>>> in sparsely populated areas (I know you have some of those),
>>>>>>>>>>> then maybe. But most likely capitalism.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ugh!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I got a new S21 and 20GB of data for $47/month taxes in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I pay a base fee of ~$4/month (deducted from consumption)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with slightly higher per-minute charge and no free data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But then I only use data in emergency (which haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened yet) and make maybe two calls and two
>>>>>>>>>>>>> texts/month. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I used to have a prepaid cell for like $10 a month back in
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2003 when it was my emergency phone.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Once I started using it all the time, it was more
>>>>>>>>>>>> cost-efficient to have a plan with unlimited talk and text.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would say that I am most frequently contacted by text
>>>>>>>>>>>> than by other modes i.e. voice call or email. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the other hand I still pay for a landline (IP) even
>>>>>>>>>>>>> though it hasn't made a sound (or call) in several years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I also have a landline. My Dad calls it and a few places
>>>>>>>>>>>> where I keep forgetting to change my contact info to my
>>>>>>>>>>>> cell. I think the landline isn't VOIP it's whatever came
>>>>>>>>>>>> before that but after rotary dial phones. 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Analog... (rotary dials relied on counting the impulses -
>>>>>>>>>>> one for each digit passed on return; pushbutton 'dialing'
>>>>>>>>>>> relied on the frequency of the tone correspondig to each
>>>>>>>>>>> digit/button) 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> They will probably phase it out eventually.
>>>>>>>>>>> Like they did with teevee signals, thus making everyone get
>>>>>>>>>>> new teevees... 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I thought I got a new tv because the old one stopped working.
>>>>>>>>> That may be, but lots of people got new tvs because their old
>>>>>>>>> one couldn't receive/decode the digital signal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The cable company gave out digital conversion boxes to people.
>>>>>>> Can you still get one of those. To use on an old teevee that you
>>>>>>> buy at an antique shop?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I doubt anything would work on a tv that old.
>>>>> In theory it would. It would require a digital to analog
>>>>> conversion and probably a granularity reduction from HD to PAL or
>>>>> [whatever the American format is called]. An old cable converter
>>>>> might just work if one could bypass the subscription bit.
>>>>
>>>> It could work from an antenna. Some channels are in the air. In HD
>>>> even. 
>>> That's what I meant, using the antenna as input for the box. A
>>> really old TV will probably make a mess of an unaltered HD signal.
>> I can imagine.
>> It would probably make a mess of SD signals too.
> And if by some miracle it could be made to work, there probably
> wouldn't be anything good on anyway.
> 
Nonsense! There are always quality programming available like those 
reality shows were a farmer needs a wife.

I have Acorn and BritBox now so I can catch up on all my British murder 
mystery shows. I feel with the writer and actor strike that there may be 
a long tv show drought.

And speaking of programming, I wrote a Python program today without 
taking a course.


>>>
>>>>>>> People without a cable subscription didn't get any, I'll bet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Probably not. No one is that nice.
>>>>> Especially not cable companies.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.