Re: First major snowfall this year
BeH <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Nov 2023 22:18:51 +0100
| Newsgroups | alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25.10.2023 16.26, Merlyne wrote: > BeH <[email protected]> wrote in > news:[email protected]: > >> On 18.10.2023 13.55, Merlyne wrote: >>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>> news:[email protected]: >>> >>>> On 04.10.2023 16.13, Merlyne wrote: >>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>> >>>>>> On 26.09.2023 14.11, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 23.09.2023 23.14, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 17.09.2023 19.50, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 09.09.2023 22.51, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 06.09.2023 14.22, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30.08.2023 14.42, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24.08.2023 16.55, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18.08.2023 14.51, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13.08.2023 23.28, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09.08.2023 14.19, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01.08.2023 13.32, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Monumental truncation] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Is this about obelisks again?] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [One can do a lot with words alone, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constructing a large stone needle I feel is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one. Also stop fixating on obelisks.] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Fine! If anyone is looking for me, I'll be outside >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drawing penises on the sidewalk] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [If you feel that will contribute to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beautification of the neighbourhood - go right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ahead. For balance you can also consider making one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of these: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/vagina- >>> sculpture- >>>>>>>>> brazil >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b678875.h >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tml ] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't mesh with my obelisk fixation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's all about balancing the artistic whole... Also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they might put a piece in the local paper about it if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What to wear? What to wear? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something in an earth tone, I would say... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or chromokey blue? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that is illegal for award shows. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Especially the prominent and televised ones like this one. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Should I just wear what I wear whenI'm posting? >>>>>>>>>>>> Sure if you want to be like one of those 'ordinary citizens' >>>>>>>>>>>> being interviewed for the news. >>>>>>>>>>>>> What are you wearing? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Black. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's easy to coordinate with. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Quite. And good for hiding in the shadows... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You don't want to do that if you are up for an award. >>>>>>>> I will if I don't win. >>>>>>> So I need to wear something black as well and no sequins. >>>>>> Only if you plan to participate in the hysterical crying and >>>>>> tearing of hair. >>>>>> >>>>> Nope. >>>> >>>> Then by all means go nuts with the sequins. >>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't want to do that since it was a lot of effort putting >>>>>>>>> myself together. >>>>>>>> You aren't made from LEGO, are you? >>>>>>> Would that excite you? >>>>>> I'm mostly sanguine in relation to LEGO, but I imagine it makes >>>>>> clothes shopping a bit challenging... >>>>> Probably makes it easier. Lego people just swap out the torso and >>>>> legs with the costume that they want to wear. >>>> But think of the (relative) size of the shopping bags you will need. >>> They can get a box delivered to their homes. >> >> I suppose. It would be an improvement on the various mystery bags that >> was so popular a few years ago... >> > I guess I missed that. It's an oldie but goodie in questionable marketing. 1) Make a series of figurines or cards or whatever, some of them in very small numbers. 2) Anonymise the product with lots of non-transparent plastic. 3) Entice kids (and/or adults) to collect them all. 4) Profit. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jules Verne. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He was french, you know. All that stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about the english he wrote in 80 days - he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made that up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't remember what he said about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> English. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The character description of Phineas Fox and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the members of the club, I mean. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't remember the descriptions. The one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who bet against Phineas Fogg was a real >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asshole. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And not even in a proper gentlemanly way, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The very first scene is where Fox fires his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> servant for serving a boiled egg that has not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been boiled exactly the required time. And >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then he goes to his club. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is in line with the behaviour of pompous >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asses on shows like Downton Abbey. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyways, it worked out for him because he met >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Passe portout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. And hired him on the spot, with no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> references and no interview or test-boiling of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eggs. Because he had to catch a train. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all have our own methods. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He was on a tight schedule at the tine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Typical. Everyone is in a hurry. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To be fair he had a lot of money on the line... I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can see where that will make someone skip some of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the details. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. Philleas Fogg, you are forgiven... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You say that now, but imagine what all his gentlemanly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acquaintances would think if they knew... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm guessing they would be thrilled that he had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-white man servant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being english it was probably more scandalous that he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employed a frenchman. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was probably socially acceptable to employ a fr*nchman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to iron your knickers and such. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could be, but as a man-servant he would be in direct >>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact with his master a lot. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But still a man-servant none-the-less. >>>>>>>>>>>> But French. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wouldn't it be better to have a Frenchman at your beck and >>>>>>>>>>> call? An exotic foreign servant? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's my impression the neither "exotic" nor "foreign" were >>>>>>>>>> considered positive attribute in that time and place. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have the opposite impression. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> May I suggest some contemporary (19th/early 20th century) >>>>>>>> literature describing the non-english populations of the >>>>>>>> empire... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Getting sleepy...can't seem to stay awake.... >>>>>>> Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe some Kipling... >>>>>> >>>>> Can you read to me? >>>>> *bats eyelashes* >>>> >>>> Sure. But do you think you can hear it from over there. >>>> (Do I even have any Kipling in the house? Hmmm) >>>> >>> You can call me and read a chapter or so or record a file and send it >>> over. >> I still don't know if I have any Kipling. Also don't you already have >> everything ever published on your e-reader thingie... >> > > I don't have *every* book... > Also, it doesn't read to me. I'm sure there is an even more advanced gizmo you can buy that will read to you in whatever voice you prefer. -- BeH " We are trapped by language to such a degree that every attempt to formulate insight is a play on words." - Niels Bohr