Re: In other news
Merlyne <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:56:20 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
BeH <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]: > On 11.02.2024 15.49, Merlyne wrote: >> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >> news:[email protected]: >> >>> On 14.01.2024 16.02, Merlyne wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please report any progress in this matter. >>>>>>>>>> Progress? >>>>>>>>> The relative change in number of incidents where people >>>>>>>>> utilise your open door since starting rants by mentioning it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This will be hard to assess in a hybrid work model. >>>>>>> So include whatever corresponds to walking through an open door >>>>>>> in your digital world. Faceapp, Whatstime or whatever... We must >>>>>>> have data. >>>>>>> >>>>>> I have tons of data. >>>>> But do you have open door policy related data is the question? >>>>> >>>> Not yet. >>> How about now? >>> >> Still none. > Any new data? > Nope. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fetch is never going to happen, Gretchen! > [point] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some dogs like it, I think. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe they want us to think that. >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I'm sure they genuinely enjoy the fetching part. It's >>>>>>>>>>>>> the letting go after having fetched they are somewhat >>>>>>>>>>>>> ambivalent about. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My dog fetches the ball/stick/whatever and then runs away. >>>>>>>>>>> IOW it can't keep cleaning up your mess. It has important >>>>>>>>>>> stuff to do. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> OR the dog does not understand the rules of engagement. >>>>>>>>> Well you have to explain it properly first. You can't just >>>>>>>>> assume the dog knows your intentions... They are a bit like >>>>>>>>> co-workers that way. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't speak dog. >>>>>>> Just speak slow and loudly in English. I'm sure that will work. >>>>>>> >>>>>> It doesn't work well with foreigners. >>>>> Doesn't the management have a course for that? >>>>> >>>> For yelling at foreigners? >>> No, for getting dogs to work well with foreigners. >>> >> I will only work if the dog speaks the same language as the >> foreigners or the foreigners used hand signals that the dog >> understands. > Alternatively the foreigners can learn the few words the dogs > understand. > It's that my first point? >>>>>>>>>> I never eat breakfast cereal. You can keep it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You mean the leprechaun can keep it. I don't eat cereal with >>>>>>>>> added sugar bits. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They're magically delicious! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Diabetes! >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, yeah. None for you! >>>>> That was never on the table. I meant for all the sugar filled >>>>> cereal eating kids... >>>>> >>>> >>>> As long as their pancreases are functioning properly, it shouldn't >>>> be a problem. >>>> You were advocating the consumption of carbs for breakfast in >>>> another post. >>> Specifically a sensible mix of simple and complex carbon. >>> "Cereal" with 30% sugar content is a candy. >>> >> That is probably most cereals. >> Without the sugar, kids won't eat it. > > Sure they will if they are hungry enough. Have you met modern day kids?