Re: In other news
Merlyne <[email protected]> Sun, 7 Apr 2024 15:29:39 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
BeH <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]: > On 31.03.2024 22.39, Merlyne wrote: >> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >> news:[email protected]: >> >>> On 12.03.2024 14.30, Merlyne wrote: >>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>> news:[email protected]: >>>> >>>>> On 24.02.2024 21.56, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11.02.2024 15.49, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>> BeH <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 14.01.2024 16.02, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please report any progress in this matter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Progress? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The relative change in number of incidents where people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utilise your open door since starting rants by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioning it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will be hard to assess in a hybrid work model. >>>>>>>>>>>>> So include whatever corresponds to walking through an open >>>>>>>>>>>>> door in your digital world. Faceapp, Whatstime or >>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever... We must have data. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have tons of data. >>>>>>>>>>> But do you have open door policy related data is the >>>>>>>>>>> question? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Not yet. >>>>>>>>> How about now? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Still none. >>>>>>> Any new data? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. >>>>> You didn't mention your open door policy at the meeting at all, >>>>> did you? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I may have. I usually talk and talk. >>>> I probably said it. At least once. >>> >>> Maybe they didn't think you meant it. Maybe your tone of voice >>> wasn't sufficient open-doorish. It can happen when one says a lot of >>> other stuff as well. >>> >> >> Maybe. >> That means no one will be by to bother me. > > Yes but also that I won't get the open-door policy data that you > promised. > Sure you will. Here it is: None >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fetch is never going to happen, Gretchen! >>>>>>> [point] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some dogs like it, I think. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe they want us to think that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I'm sure they genuinely enjoy the fetching part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the letting go after having fetched they are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhat ambivalent about. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My dog fetches the ball/stick/whatever and then runs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> away. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IOW it can't keep cleaning up your mess. It has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important stuff to do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OR the dog does not understand the rules of engagement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you have to explain it properly first. You can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just assume the dog knows your intentions... They are a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit like co-workers that way. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't speak dog. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just speak slow and loudly in English. I'm sure that will >>>>>>>>>>>>> work. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't work well with foreigners. >>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't the management have a course for that? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For yelling at foreigners? >>>>>>>>> No, for getting dogs to work well with foreigners. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will only work if the dog speaks the same language as the >>>>>>>> foreigners or the foreigners used hand signals that the dog >>>>>>>> understands. >>>>>>> Alternatively the foreigners can learn the few words the dogs >>>>>>> understand. >>>>>>> >>>>>> It's that my first point? >>>>> The reverse. This it the foreigner speaking (some words in) the >>>>> same language as the dog. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never eat breakfast cereal. You can keep it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean the leprechaun can keep it. I don't eat cereal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with added sugar bits. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're magically delicious! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Diabetes! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, yeah. None for you! >>>>>>>>>>> That was never on the table. I meant for all the sugar >>>>>>>>>>> filled cereal eating kids... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As long as their pancreases are functioning properly, it >>>>>>>>>> shouldn't be a problem. >>>>>>>>>> You were advocating the consumption of carbs for breakfast in >>>>>>>>>> another post. >>>>>>>>> Specifically a sensible mix of simple and complex carbon. >>>>>>>>> "Cereal" with 30% sugar content is a candy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is probably most cereals. >>>>>>>> Without the sugar, kids won't eat it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure they will if they are hungry enough. >>>>>> >>>>>> Have you met modern day kids? >>>>> Sure. The kids today are okay. It's whoever buys their breakfast >>>>> cereal that's screwed up. >>>>> >>>> >>>> 100% The parents make the kids mental. >>> >>> And then drags them to a doctor who blindly prescribes some stuff to >>> counteract the hyper activity... >>> >> >> That too. >> >> Big pharma likes people to get used to popping pills every day >> starting a young age. > > And not even always the fun ones... > They don't sell those kinds of pills.