Re: "Lock Up Gays," Says 'Family' Leader

On 7/31/22 8:57 PM, Why Waste Money On Queers? wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Very happy to see Swallwell fail after his immature ignorant behavior with a Chink whore spy.
>>
>> Monkey Pox, right on time to give Democrats an excuse to cheat in the next election.
> 
> A senior representative of the Family Research Council went on
> national television last week and called for all men who engage
> in homosexual acts to be locked up.
> 
> Peter Sprigg, a senior fellow for the FRC, had been debating
> gays in the military when he ran into a hardball from MSNBC host
> Chris Matthews.
> 
> “So you think we should outlaw gay behavior,” Matthews asked.
> 
> “Yes,” Sprigg replied, adding ““I think that the Supreme Court
> decision in Lawrence v. Texas, which overturned the sodomy laws
> in this country, was wrongly decided. I think there would be a
> place for criminal sanctions against homosexual behavior.”
> 
> Sprigg is a policy maker and think tank rep for FRC, whose
> position papers and talking points are routinely adopted and
> disseminated by representatives of the religious right, and
> endorsed by their spokespersons on the Hill.
> 
> His answers to questions by Matthews evolved out of a discussion
> on why gays and lesbians should be prohibited from servicing in
> the armed forces.
> 
> “The presence of homosexuals in the military,” Sprigg replied,
> “is incompatible with good order, morale, discipline, and unit
> cohesion.” Then he threw in the part about locking us all up.
> 
> The disturbing endorsement came during the February 2 segment of
> “Hardball,” while Sprigg debated Aubrey Sarvis, executive
> director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN), an
> organization which defends GLBT servicemen and women discharged
> under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT).
> 
> This was too much for Sarvis, the former chief counsel for the
> Senate Commerce Committee and a U.S. Army veteran.
> 
> “There is no data, there is no evidence, there is no study
> whatsoever that you can point to which supports that outrageous
> statement,” Sarvis responded.
> 
> During the “Hardball” broadcast, SLDN’s Sarvis challenged
> Sprigg’s data-less assertions. “I would also suggest to you that
> 79% of Americans today support gays and lesbians being able to
> serve their country openly,” Sarvis said.
> 
> Replying to Sprigg’s biblical arguments supporting anti-sodomy
> laws, Sarvis reminded Matthews’ viewers of the latest Gallup
> polling which states that “61% of weekly churchgoers support
> gays and lesbians being able to serve openly.”
> 
> In South Florida, American Veterans for Equal Rights (AVER)
> spokesman Andy Eddy was spooked by the stunning remarks of
> Sprigg. Said Eddy, “Gay and straight service members should be
> bound by the same limitations covered under the Uniform Code of
> Military Justice. We often hear of the argument against gays as
> being prone to unacceptable sexual misconduct while little, if
> anything, is ever mentioned about heterosexuals on the same
> playing field.”
> 
> Lock them up or start shooting them.
> 
> https://southfloridagaynews.com/National/lock-up-gays-family-
> leader-quote.html
> 
Probably a victim of a gay family member... the odd one out and no need 
to listen to radicals with a personal interest in the question of 
grooming children... for LGBTQ+ sex.

What should be done is to treat people for what they are and the gays 
aren't all dangerous, they're mentally ill and that mental illness is a 
RED FLAG that more serious mental illness is likely to be connected to 
the person exhibiting LGBTQ sexual issues. So rather than locking anyone 
up they need to be diagnosed to find the deeper problems if any, that 
they have.

What should be is the nature of Mental illness should not be ignored and 
that way we don't ignore the dangers of mental illness, but it all has 
to be done within the confines of the law and due process.  There is 
never an emergency that is superior to the RIGHTS of the individual. If 
there is then why has Hunter Biden and Joe Biden NOT been removed to a 
prison cell by Emergency powers that are superior to the Constitution, 
why would that Constitution protect only Hunter Biden and Joe Biden and 
NOT also protect you and I and our RIGHTS during an EMERGENCY.





-- 
-That's karma-

The result is DEMOCRATS lies about history and reality to themselves and 
others means their attempts to figure-out what's wrong is an exercise in 
futility, because what they think they know they really don't know, and 
fixing problems without the truth... becomes a fools errand.