Re: [Woke...] Cambridge Dictionary changes definition of 'man' and 'woman'
Mack A. Damia <[email protected]> Sun, 08 Jan 2023 11:57:19 -0800
| Newsgroups | talk.politics.guns,alt.usage.english,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.democrats,sac.politics,alt.activism.children.molesters,alt.politics.homosexuality |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 19:52:06 -0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro" <[email protected]> wrote: >https://nypost.com/2022/12/13/cambridge-dictionary-changes-definition-of- >man-and-woman/ > >Cambridge Dictionary is being blasted by critics online for revising the >definition of Âman and Âwoman to include people who do not identify with >the sex they were assigned at birth. > >ÂMan is now includes the definition Âan adult who lives and identifies as >a male though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth. > >In the same vein, the updated definition of Âwoman reads Âan adult who >lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a >different sex at birth. > >Both definitions previously reflected the outdated views on sex, which >assumed that sex and gender identity always adhered to one another. > >The changes were quickly derided on the Internet, with political >commentator Steven Crowder tweeting ÂRemember, if you can control the >language, you can control the population. > >Daily Caller writer Mary Rooke called the dictionary writers ÂF-ing >traitors to the truth. > >ÂCambridge Dictionary is only the latest. If we donÂt stop them from >erasing women our civilization is [not going to make it], she claimed. > >Dan McLaughin, a senior writer at National Review, viewed the revision as >dystopian as opposed to progressive. > >Â1984 wasnÂt supposed to be a how-to manual, he tweeted. > >Still, some social media users pushed back on the backlash, labeling >critics transphobic and celebrating the changes as more inclusive. > >ÂGuess what transphobes are upset about now? You guessed the dictionary, >didnÂt you, Evan Urquhart of Assigned Media tweeted. > >Â[Trans-exclusionary radical feminists] ganna [sp] blow a gasket, >sculptor Daniel Lismore shared. ÂTrans people deserve to be recognized for >who they are. > >Similarly, the UK-based group Bristol Leading Against Transphobia hailed >the decision as ÂFantastic news. I imagine that Rome, Greece and other ancient civilizations began their decline with cultural confusion and division.