Re: Use 2 or 3 Forms of Birth Control and Avoid Unplanned Pregnancies

On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 19:58:09 -0700, "Brett Smith"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>If you have sex, use at least 2 forms of birth control, or 3 if you
>have sex frequently.  This means condoms and the pull-out method
>and/or the pill/hormonal or diaphragm/sponge.  If you're a male you
>can only count on 2 forms until you know your partner; condoms and
>pull-out. If you're female you can count on 2 or 3 forms until you
>know your partner; condoms and hormonal and/or diaphragm/sponge. 
>Never rely on just the pull-out method or just the sponge, or actually
>just 1 form of birth control alone, period. 
>>
>50% of all unplanned pregnancies occur in people using just 1 form of
>birth control and the other 50% used no birth control.  Don't get
>pregnant unless you plan on it.  Use 2 or 3 forms of birth control. 
>All birth control should say on the package: use in conjunction with
>another form of birth control.
>
>Keep semen out of orifices for general protection against pregnancy
>and STD's.
>>
>>2 or 3 forms of birth control is safer than a vasectomy or a tubal ligation.
>>
>>Proof:
>We're told that presuming an average of 80-100 sex act per year, the
>risk of pregnancy using the condom is 1 in 50 in perfect use, and 1 in
>6 in typical use, and that the risk of pregnancy using hormonal birth
> control pills is a 1 in 333 in perfect use and 1 in 12 in typical
>use.  This means at least 1 in 333 couples using hormonal birth
>control in a given year will still get pregnant.  That's not very
>good.  Multiply that over 10 years, and it's even worse.  To calculate
>the risk of using two forms of birth control, many people multiply 1
>in 50 x 1 in 333 and assume a risk using both of 1 in 16,650 in
>perfect use and 1 in 72 (1/6x1/12) in typical use, which is still
>pretty bad.  However, that is the yearly risk times the yearly risk. 
>That is like if you took a single die, presumed a 1 in 6 risk of
>pregnancy with your birth control, thus the 1 side was pregnancy, the
>other five sides were not, rolled the die 2 times for a presumed 2
>yearly acts, did that with another die/form of birth control, again, 2
>chances for your 2 acts of sex on your 1 in 6 risk, so 2 in 6 = 1 in 3
>risk on each die/form of birth control , and multiplied 1 in 3 times 1
>in 3 calculating a combined 1 in 9 yearly risk, when really it should
>be 2 in 36 which equals 1 in 18.  Because rolling the 2 die together
>the risk of snake eyes is 1 in 36, roll them twice for 2 presumed
>yearly acts, the risk is 2 in 36.  1/6x1/6=1/36, x2 = 2/36=1/18.
>>
>If the rates of pregnancy we're told are based on 100 presumed yearly
>sex acts, then the risk of using the condom per year in perfect use of
>1 in 50 must become a risk of 1 in 5,000 per _act_, and the risk per
>year in typical use of 1 in 6 must become 1 in 600 per _act_ .  The
>risk of pregnancy of using hormonal birth control pills per year in
>perfect use of 1 in 333 must become a risk 1 in 33,300 per _act_, and
>the risk per year in typical use of 1 in 12 must become 1 in 1,200 per
>_act_.  Therefore, I conclude multiplying 1 in 5,000 x 1 in 33,300
>results in a 166,500,000 per act risk in perfect use and 720,000 per
>act risk in typical use, or presuming 100 sex acts, a 1 in 1,665,000
>yearly risk in perfect use and a 1 in 7,200 yearly risk in typical
>use.  If you calculate this out to the number of people of our society
>it makes the risk of getting pregnant about equivalent to dying in a
>car accident, keeping in mind your individual risk must be in between
>perfect and typical use.  If you could eliminate the risk of driving
>in a car you would, so use three forms of birth control when you have
>sex on a regular basis.
>>
>If anyone wants to run this by several university statisticians and
>inform all high school sex-education teachers and planned parenthood,
>good.
>>
>Because of the 5 million pregnancies per year, only 2.5 million of
>them - or half - are planned.  Of the other 2.5 million unplanned
>pregnancies, 1 million are terminated in abortion and 1.5 million are
>brought to term.  Thus 1.5 million of the 4 million babies born per
>year are unplanned and 2.5 million are planned.  37.5% of the nation
>is thus unplanned, due to a lack of a use of birth control, and this
>must surely have a negative effect upon the socio-economic status of
>our society.  Remember half these unplanned pregnancies occur in
>people who use just one form of birth control.
>>
>Send a memo to the Pope, too.  Unsafe sex that takes a risk with
>another person's life - the baby's - is immoral.  But sex that uses 2
>or 3 forms of birth control is safe and moral, and birth control
>should thus be advocated!  

There is one way that is certain to prevent pregnancy and STDs.
That is cross species sex.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uAAP3PbkRI

=-=-
Duke and Gladys. Dumb and dumber