Re: Are Flock cameras next? Supreme Court rules against police using sprawling cell phone location data

On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 08:35:28 -0000 (UTC), Schlomo Goldberg wrote:

>Scott Hoge <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On 2026-07-07, Flocked Up <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> From there, police are able to expand the warrant and look
>>> deeper into specific accounts and addresses to get identity
>>> information. 
>>>
>>> The Supreme Court is making it harder or even impossible to get
>>> them.  The justices ruled that these warrants could constitute
>>> an unreasonable search and seizure, because oftentimes
>>> citizens' data is scooped up and investigated even if they have
>>> no connection to the crime. 
>>>
>>> "I don't believe my cell number being found in a particular
>>> location is particularly troublesome to me if I haven't
>>> committed any crimes," McDonald said. 
>>>
>>> But just because someone else committed a crime, it doesn't
>>> mean that there is no longer a right to privacy, Benza said. 
>>
>> Enough with this "right to privacy."
>
>We seal envelopes not because the letter contains a conspiracy, but
>because the contents belong exclusively to the sender and the receiver.
>
>The "nothing to hide" argument is pure corporate/state
>propaganda. Privacy isn't about hiding a crime; it's about deciding who
>gets access to your life. It's a boundary of power, not a shield of
>guilt.
>
>https://dontgetflocked.com/

Butthole COVID Sweeps US!
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJwjvNYKuyY>
-- 
<https://www.youtube.com/shorts/bI2CA3XOSk0>

So now that the idiot in chief has bombed Iran 
and shut down Hormuz *again* . . .

. . . you guys finally willing to admit voting for that 
rat bastard was a mistake?

012020298647