Maybe Someone Meant "Invasion," And Not "Insurrection."
Intelligent Party <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.obama,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.activism.d |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Maybe someone meant to say "invasion," and not "insurrection." According to the dictionary, it looks like the "act" has to be violent. If some violence occurred, is not an excuse to stereotype the 99% who did not support such violence. Only that one person, then, would be involved in an "insurrection." It wasn't an insurrection, whether someone meant to say insurrection or not. If they did mean to say insurrection, they're a liar, or in grave error. That lie persists in the Media today. Thought precedes action. Good thought precedes good action. Bad though precedes bad action. That it was an "insurrection," is a thought; preceding police action.