Maybe Someone Meant "Invasion," And Not "Insurrection."

Intelligent Party <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.obama,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.activism.d
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Maybe someone meant to say "invasion," and not "insurrection."


According to the dictionary, it looks like the "act" has to be violent.  If some 
violence occurred, is not an excuse to stereotype the 99% who did not support such 
violence.  Only that one person, then, would be involved in an "insurrection."

It wasn't an insurrection, whether someone meant to say insurrection or not.  If 
they did mean to say insurrection, they're a liar, or in grave error.  That lie 
persists in the Media today.

Thought precedes action.  Good thought precedes good action. Bad though precedes 
bad action.  That it was an "insurrection," is a thought; preceding police action.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.