Bump: Re: The Ukraine and the Two New Republics should consider Free Association
Intelligent Party <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Apr 2022 11:03:16 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.obama,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.activism.d |
|---|---|
| Organization | - |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/2/2022 9:33 AM, Intelligent Party wrote: > The Ukraine and the two new republics should consider Free Association: > > This would include: > > 1.The right to Work. > 2.The right to Reside. > 3.Equal rights. > 4.If Political rights. > 5.And Human rights. > > This would be possible, even if the two new republics decide to request annexation > by Russia sometime in the future, which they may never do. If so, two > possibilities would be that while both the Ukraine and Russia could use both the > republics, people residing in the republics would have both the Ukraine and > Russia, if they had lived in the new republic for a period of years, or else as of > a certain date and/or were descendants. > > Perhaps in the future, the EU and the EAEU will each have each other anyway. > Russia is part of Europe, and not Arabia. We are not nations of eternal war, and > wish to see peace through a united Europe. > > > Norway and Iceland are not in the EU, but have a separate EFTA - European Free > Trade Association, which has the EU: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Free_Trade_Association > > > The U.S. has a Compact of Free Association with the Marshall islands, Micronesia, > and Palau: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_of_Free_Association > > > Additionally, as a token of good will, the Russians can perhaps put Crimea in Free > Association with the Ukraine as well. Or, more extremely, the entirety of Russia > could be in Free Association with the Ukraine, while the Ukraine joins the EU. The > second idea would perhaps entail a little more border and immigration issues at > the Ukrainian borders. > Bump