Non-Binary - Hermaphrodites Are As Common As Red Hair - 2% Of The U.S. Society
Intelligent Party <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:40:37 -0800
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.obama,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.activism.d |
|---|---|
| Organization | - |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Non-binary people are often hermaphrodites. As can be seen from this chart, there are different degrees of hermaphroditism: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EvGigJyXEA4xaRw.jpg Hermaphroditism is as common as red hair. 1%-2% of the population. Perhaps 50½ of hermaphrodites have disparate genitals as in the chart above, while 50½ have 100% penis, or 100% vagina, yet are nevertheless biologically 50% male & 50% female, or some combination - 90%/10%, 80%/20%, 70%/30%, 60%/40%, of female/male or male/female. They are also known as "Intersex." See the following entry on Wikipedia for Intersex: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex Infant surgical genital assignment should be outlawed, as someone may have more male genitals, and be more biologically female (so the physician screwed what little was left of the female's existent genitals), or have more female genitals and be more biologically male, (so the physician screwed what little was left of the male's existent genitals). So it's like their gender was changed as a baby. It's no ones business to assign anyone. Besides that, it's up to you to choose who you want to be - it's not anyone's business to assign you, nor objectify you, as anything, and you don't have to be defined by your gender. And regardless of biology, there is a mental aspect here, and mental problems are subjective, there is no such thing as objective psychology, just objective immorality and crime because it harms others, and there is subjective psychology. But you only objectify in psychology, to distance yourself, from the subjective problem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-binary_gender Furthermore normal male infant circumcision should be outlawed as mutilation. People can decide if they want body modification when they're older, but infant male circumcision is done 100% against an infant's will. They could put these two in the same Federal bill, because their should be a Federal law, against both these crimes. To harm no one, was the Hippocratic oath.