Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 01:42:50 -0700, "Andrew"
<[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> Andrew wrote:
>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not possible, except in the realm of fantasy. But
>>>>>>>>> for those who want the truth, science will always
>>>>>>>>> be the way to go, and not unscientific fantasy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am constantly amused by how you insist anything involving
>>>>>>>> your silly superstition is based on science yet anything in
>>>>>>>> the arena of possible scientific investigation is fantasy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You obviously don't know the difference between
>>>>>>> "possible science"(fantasy) and "empirical science".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What conservation laws would be violated if an organic, self- replicating molecule
>>>>>>  would be artificially synthesized?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're saying that it is "artificially synthesized", rather than, "naturally synthesized".
>>>>> Therefore you acknowledge that a high *Intelligence* was involved in its Creation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you, Dawn!
>>>>> Do you get the picture now?
>>>>>
>>>>>> By the way, have you ever heard of "artificial selection"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you think that natural selection, which took eons,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could 'natural selection' explain our origins? No, because
>>>>> 'natural selection' can only select from .that which *already*
>>>>> exists.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, sure, artificial selection involves intelligence (humans), which is why it can happen so very quickly:
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_breed
>>>>
>>>> The domestic dog is the first species, and the only large carnivore, to have been domesticated. The first dogs were certainly
>>>> wolflike, but the phenotypic changes that coincided with the dog–wolf genetic divergence are not known.[15] Dogs are the most
>>>> variable mammal on earth with around 450 globally recognized dog breeds.[2] In the Victorian era, directed human selection
>>>> developed the modern dog breeds, which resulted in a vast range of phenotypes.[15] Most breeds were derived from small numbers
>>>> of founders within the last 200 years, [15][2] and since then dogs have undergone rapid phenotypic change and were formed into
>>>> today's modern breeds due to artificial selection imposed by humans.
>>>>
>>>> And, so, yes, with an intelligent agent, evolution can happen very quickly!
>>>
>>> That's speciation rather than evolution. They all
>>> came from the original dog 'kind' at the Creation
>>> (Gen 1:24-25).
>>>
>>> They started with dogs, and ended up with dogs.
>>>
>>> That's all!
>>>
>>>> Now, why did it take God
>>>
>>> You finally concede He is.
>>>
>>>> 4.5 billion years to guide evolution to the Dawn
>>>>  of Humanity? How about the "boring billion":
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boring_Billion
>>>
>>> What you cite is called 'unscientific fantasy',
>>>
>>> Someone conjured it up in their imagination,
>>> and you fell for it.
>>>
>>>>  Why the "slow biological evolution"?? What
>>>>  was God doing during all of this time??!
>>>>
>>>> Dawn
>>>
>>> Rather why were you so gullible to believe that?
>>
>> How old is the Earth, Andrew?  Universe?  You won't answer, will
>> you? Of course, others have asked you this question ad nauseam.
>___________________________________________________
>
>Notice folks, that our friend here Dawn, has just pulled a ~~"Red Herring"!
>
>Which is a logical fallacy used by those who try to argue -against- the truth!.
>
>She is unable to logically address the above post, so she attempts to use a
>'Red Herring' to extricate herself from her embarrassing, foolish  position.
>____________________________________________________
>
>What is a red herring logical fallacy?
>
>A red herring is a misleading statement, question, or argument meant to
>redirect a conversation away from its original topic.
>
>In a debate, a participant might use a red herring to avoid discussing a
>topic for which they don’t have a well-developed position or if their
>position could make them look bad
>
>(https://www.grammarly.com/blog/rhetorical-devices/red-herring-fallacy/)
>

This is a very simple question - which you will avoid at all
costs.

-- 

DSA - Demented Suicidal Absurd

Every person in the US is here either  
legally or illegally. Those that are 
here illegally should be afraid.  
Be very afraid.  It does not matter 
how long you have been here.  It does 
not matter why you are here. It does not 
matter what you have done legally while you 
were here. It does not matter what any 
relative may have done while you were here. 
It only matters that you are here illegally. 
It may take a day, a week, a year, or longer 
but we will find you and we will deport you. 
Be prepared.

Deport them all.

Due process:
Q. Are you here legally?  If so, where is 
the documentation to establish that?

I support ending birthright citizenship

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like 
the truth.  They start with the biggest 
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting 
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression, 
display or support of religion or 
religious positions.

AA 966