Re: THERE IS NO GHOST IN THE FETUS IN THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS = 17.333 WEEKS

On 5/6/23 00:39, Intelligent Party wrote:
> There is no ghost in the fetus in the first 17.333 Weeks = FOUR MONTHS.


	No evidence of any ghost at any stage of life from conception to death. 
  The so-called immortal soul is just a way to con the believer and make 
them submissive to the dictates of organized religion's grift.

	I won't bother with the rest of your remarks because in many respects I 
agree.

> 
> Women with FOUR MONTHS to abort, who do not abort; are COMMITTED to the 
> pregnancy, and do not seek an abortion after four months.  (While in 
> illegal unholy States, women WITHOUT four months to abort, may still be 
> seeking an abortion, after four months, as they have been DENIED, their 
> human right to abortion).
> 
> After FOUR MONTHS, of ability to abort, some women may still seek to 
> abort a HANDICAPPED fetus.  But there is likely NO GHOST in a 
> handicapped fetus, BECAUSE the ghost comes in, BETWEEN four months and 
> birth, and why would a ghost enter a handicapped fetus, until the last 
> minute!?
> 
> Furthermore, you have an ABSOLUTE right to separate your body, 
> absolutely, so forced surrogate mothers of a handicapped fetus, is a CRIME!
> 
> Would you bring a handicapped baby into the world, and tell it to live 
> its whole entire life handicapped from birth?  Even if there WAS a ghost 
> in the fetus at some point, it looses WHAT? by reincarnating?  It looses 
> it's body, it's intelligence, it's property, it's friends, it's career; 
> it has none!  If your ONE YEAR OLD, got in an accident and lost its arms 
> and its legs, would you put it to death, for its own sake?  Would you 
> wait until it was FIVE, to say, maybe you should take these suicide 
> pills or a do a Heroin overdose tonight?
> 
> Yet infant male Circumcision is a CRIME.  Female Genital mutilation is a 
> CRIME. Sexual assignment surgery of infant Hermaphrodites/Intersex is a 
> CRIME.  Female genital mutilation is like cutting the male dickhead 
> off.  Infant male circumcision is like trimming an infant female's pussy 
> lips.  Doing this to a baby is like doing this to an ADULT AGAINST THEIR 
> WILL.  All three atrocities are obviously against the Hippocratic oath 
> and should be OUTLAWED!
> 
> Yet the RELIGIOUS RIGHT, believe in life before life, and life after 
> death, so why would they believe, you come out of a zygote?  Every 
> religion confirms reincarnation.  (Jesus confirmed John the Baptist is 
> the reincarnation of Elijah. Reincarnation is not the only option, yet a 
> common choice.)
> 
> It's all population vs. property; it's all labor vs. capital.  Poverty 
> and unequal poverty are the root of all kinds of evil, and 
> overpopulation is the root of poverty.  Overpopulation is the scourge of 
> our nation!  Bankrupt unskilled immigrants, from poor countries, are let 
> in by Democrats, and Bankrupt unskilled unplanned children, are let in 
> by Republicans!  Both parties are OUT OF IT, and deserve redemption!
> 
> Yet we SHOULD have FREE ABORTIONS, in the FIRST FOUR MONTHS, for 
> EVERYONE, but parental consent is a CRIME!  EVERY TEEN HAS AN ABSOLUTE 
> RIGHT TO ABORTION, WITHOUT THEIR PARENTS PERMISSION, NOR NOTIFICATION!  
> Further, children are meant to be BROUGHT UP, and not belittled, eleven 
> year olds are adults, and should be treated as such, and afforded the 
> EQUAL RIGHTS OF MAN.
> 
> Yet if you do not use birth control, you will get pregnant tonight, in a 
> single sex act.  Use hormonal plus one, of either condoms, pull-out, or 
> diaphragm, OR use all the other three, condoms, pull-out, and diaphragm, 
> concurrently.
> 
> For on the pill alone, in twelve years, you will be pregnant.
> 
> For sporadic sex, Men should use condoms and pull-out concurrently.
> For ongoing sex, men should use hormonal plus one, or all the other 
> three, concurrently.
> For both sporadic and ongoing sex, Women should always use hormonal plus 
> one, or all the other three concurrently, since they initially have no 
> control over pull-out anyway, to keep it simple.
> 
> While using hormonal birth control, should basically be a woman's 
> independent choice; AS ONLY 25% of women actually are ON hormonal birth 
> control, and IUDs; its basically going to be condoms and the pull-out 
> method, or you additionally get a diaphragm going, or bring back the 
> Today Sponge, to the market, who's patent has expired, and anyone can 
> now commercially produce (or add the rhythm method).
> 
> For sporadic sex, men merely use condoms and pull-out.
> 
> For ongoing sex, men use HORMONAL PLUS ONE, or all the other three, of 
> condoms and pull-out and diaphragm.
> 
> Women always use hormonal plus one, or all the other three of condoms 
> and pull-out and diaphragm (to remain simple, as control over the 
> pull-out with a new friend is limited anyway).
> 
> (so there are two analytical questions: 1) whether ongoing or sporadic, 
> and 2) whether using hormonal or not; means four possibilities).
> 
> What actually *is* sporadic, is a question:  While the number of sex 
> acts used to determine the risks is 80-100 per year, (eight per month), 
> it MAY be, that as few as just TWO acts per month (24 per year) may 
> actually make it just as dangerous as eight times per month.  30% of 
> couples, trying, get pregnant in 1 month, 30% in 3 months, 20% in 6 
> months, 20% in 12 months or longer.
> 
> Women who do not have access to either hormonal or a diaphragm, may want 
> to consider learning the rhythm methods, and using condoms and pull-out, 
> two weeks out of month when safe, and abstaining from intercourse other 
> two weeks. This makes for TWO methods, rhythm and condoms, INITIALLY, 
> and then THREE when, control over pull-out is more possible with an 
> ongoing more trusted partner.
> 
> And keeping semen out of orifices is a general good idea for sporadic 
> sex.  And for sporadic sex you want condoms for STDs.
> 
> So for ongoing, you have more sex, which makes it more dangerous for 
> pregnancy, but you don't have to worry as much about STDs (assuming you 
> have only one partner) especially if you get tested for HIV, Gonorrhea, 
> Chlamydia, & Syphilis. (NO tests for Herpes, Crabs, Scabies, 
> Trichomoniasis; but be vaccinated for HPV/Warts & Hepatitis A and B).
> 
> Sex is a positive holy religious activity, which should NOT be 
> condemned, but unsafe sex is immoral, for unplanned childbirth is the 
> scourge of nations.  Thus, slut pride, not slut shame!
> 
> Lasciviousness, both in and out of the bedroom, is a human right!
> 
> It's no porn star's fault, they got pregnant.  They have promiscuous sex 
> for their job!  (Porn stars are masters of the pull-out method 1/25, yet 
> it doesn't work so well for the common folk 1/3).
> 
> There is no love in this world, for people who don't have sex.  Behind 
> every successful person is love, because behind every successful person 
> is energy. Premarital sex is obviously recommended, and it is 
> recommended you have sex with more than one person in your life, and 
> more than one person before you get married!
> 
> THERE IS NO GHOST IN THE FETUS, IN THE FIRST _FOUR MONTHS_ = 17.333 WEEKS!
> 
> IF THERE IS NO GHOST, IT IS IMMORAL TO *NOT* ABORT!  IT IS IMMORAL TO 
> *NOT* ABORT!
> 
> 
> IT IS IMMORAL TO *NOT* ABORT!
> 
> 
> People have memories of being in the womb, and as the below comments 
> show, people have memories of being in the afterlife and then being 
> born.  No one has memories of being in the womb more than five months 
> before birth!
> 
> See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjBasF0M3-4   and read the comments 
> below the video, after you finish reading this post, for confirmation.
> 
> We should have FREE FEDERAL ABORTIONS for everyone in the country.  At 
> less than $1,000 per abortion, 2 million abortions per year, would only 
> cost $2 billion per year.  Twenty-six million, unghosted fetuses, 
> aborted in thirteen years x $15,000 K-12, = $390 billion saved per year 
> = $3.9 Trillion per decade saved.
> 
> Every great civilization, is founded on population planning (not 
> control), farms, universities, liberty, and (wilful) communal charity - 
> saving capital while sharing the wealth!
> 
> 
> If there was a way to, would you force a woman to put her premature baby 
> BACK into her uterus, or force the dad to attach it to himself?  
> Preemies born at 21 weeks, live for 1-3 hours before dying.  So I was 
> like, was that somebody's past life? Or did they remember that at all, 
> or even come into the preemie as a Spirit?  My cousin was a preemie, in 
> an incubator, and she remembers trying to see if she was going to be 
> that person.
> 
> 
> I ask you, how has the U.S. Supreme Court, in its criminal ignorance, 
> not been impeached for overturning abortion?  They're not holy priests, 
> nor authorities. They're just normal people like you and me.  We ALL 
> have ability to opinion and judgement.  No split court non 9-0 decision, 
> should or could ever convince the nation.  If the court is too stupid to 
> convince the other's on the court, it surely can't have science 100%, or 
> convince the nation.  No-one should believe in, nor obey the court.  The 
> court is crime, and should be impeached.  Why?  Because we say.  There 
> is no higher authority than us.
> 
> "Do you not know that we shall judge angels?  How much more, things that 
> pertain to this life?"
> - Paul the Apostle, 2 Corinthians 6:3, Holy Bible, New Testament, NKJV
> 
> 
> "Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the 
> unrighteous, and not before the saints?  Do you not know that the saints 
> will judge the world?  And if the world will be judged by you, are you 
> unworthy to judge the smallest matters?  Do you not know that we shall 
> judge angels?  How much more, things that pertain to this life?  If then 
> you have judgments concerning things pertaining to this life, do you 
> appoint those who are least esteemed by the church to judge?  I say this 
> to your shame.  Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you, not 
> even one, who will be able to judge between his brethren?  But brother 
> goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers!
> 
> Now therefore, it is already an utter failure for you that you go to law 
> against one another.  Why do you not rather accept wrong?  Why do you 
> not rather let yourselves be cheated?  No, you yourselves do wrong and 
> cheat, and you do these things to your brethren!  Do you not know that 
> the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God?  Do not be deceived."
> - Paul the Apostle, 1 Corinthians 6:1-6:9a, Holy Bible, New Testament, NKJV
> https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+6%3A1-6%3A9&version=NKJV
> 
> If Paul the Apostle condemned sexuality, I do not corroborate him there,
> yet he said many fine things which prove he's a Saint.  You don't have 
> to agree with everything he said, yet if half of what he said, is true, 
> and you corroborate him, he corroborates you.  For instance, he 
> obviously knew nothing of Hermaphrodites/Intersex/Nonbinary, which is 
> biologically proven to be as common as red hair.  So what, are 
> hermaphrodites not supposed to have sex  or get married?
> He even condemned adultery, which Jesus patently forgave (though it 
> remains an error to insult and lie to your spouse).
> 
> Further:
> "Now concerning virgins: I have no commandment from the Lord; yet I give 
> judgment as one whom the Lord in His mercy has made trustworthy."
> - Paul the Apostle, 2 Corinthians 7:25, Holy Bible, New Testament, NKJV
> https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+7%3A25&version=NKJV
> 
> Rather his whole authority on sexuality, and his condemnation of such 
> things, I would think!
> 
> Nevertheless, UNSAFE sex is immoral, for it takes a risk with another 
> person's life - the baby's (as well as your own - though as to your own, 
> that's not immorality, but your choice, and _bad_ for you; not wrong).  
> So plan to use two or three types of birth control, concurrently, 
> Hormonal plus One, - or Condoms, plus Diaphragm, plus Pull-Out, - or ABORT!
> 
> King Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines.
> 
> Sex is a positive holy religious activity, which should NOT be 
> condemned, but unsafe sex is immoral, for unplanned childbirth is the 
> scourge of nations.

	Good luck.

-- 
bliss dash SF 4 ever at dslextreme dot com