Re: Edgar Allan Poe's Omega Point Cosmology
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.misc,alt.activism |
|---|---|
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 1 May 2024, Jamie Michelle wrote: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:22:57 -0400, "68hx.1806" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Poe was an under-respected polymath indeed. >> >> However an "insightful" theory is just a theory, >> like Democritus and "atoms". Neither had a shred >> of PROOF, no evidence and logical steps that would >> lead to a CONCLUSION. It was pure speculation in >> a sea of speculation. >> >> And no, math does not prove the existence of 'gods'. >> >> As for the universe being open or closed - the jury >> is still out on that. There have been recent worries >> that the markers used to judge expansion might not >> be as reliable as first believed - plus some info >> that the "dark energy" input may be "variable". >> >> In any case, I'd suggest you move to the "religious" >> groups. > > Oh, this has everything to do with politics: There is a haping hole in all of this, and that is that there is no god, unless god is proved, and no one has managed to do that. So without a god, the rest of yoru argument falls. Sorry. =(