Re: Edgar Allan Poe's Omega Point Cosmology

On 5/2/24 6:16 AM, D wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 1 May 2024, Jamie Michelle wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:22:57 -0400, "68hx.1806" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Poe was an under-respected polymath indeed.
>>>
>>> However an "insightful" theory is just a theory,
>>> like Democritus and "atoms". Neither had a shred
>>> of PROOF, no evidence and logical steps that would
>>> lead to a CONCLUSION. It was pure speculation in
>>> a sea of speculation.
>>>
>>> And no, math does not prove the existence of 'gods'.
>>>
>>> As for the universe being open or closed - the jury
>>> is still out on that. There have been recent worries
>>> that the markers used to judge expansion might not
>>> be as reliable as first believed - plus some info
>>> that the "dark energy" input may be "variable".
>>>
>>> In any case, I'd suggest you move to the "religious"
>>> groups.
>>
>> Oh, this has everything to do with politics:
> 
> There is a gaping hole in all of this, and that is that there is no god, 
> unless god is proved, and no one has managed to do that.

   For the most part, "godS" ...

   So, they were ALL wrong ???  :-)

   Anyway, if you create a huge, ultra-complex, theology
   it's on YOU to PROVE it - not on anyone else to disprove.

> So without a god, the rest of your argument falls. Sorry. =(

   But they *believe* - and that fills in all the gaps
   dontchaknow ...

   Still waiting for some Hobbits to show up  :-)