Re: An FBI Agent Refused To Go Along With The Biden Admin's Anti-'Extremism' Agenda - It Cost Him His Career

None <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2024, a425couple wrote
> (Message-ID: <[email protected]>):
> 
>> On 12/14/24 11:47, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
>>> https://dailycaller.com/2024/12/09/josh-hurwit-zach-schoffstall-idaho-
>>> patriot-front/
>>> 
>>> When Zach Schoffstall, a former supervisory senior resident agent in the
>>> FBI’s Salt Lake City Division, heard his bosses wanted to focus more on
>>> “domestic terrorism” and “hate crimes,” he tried to work with them.
>>> He
>>> brought the U.S. Attorney in Idaho two hate crime cases.
>>> 
>>> The U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) declined to prosecute both. Instead,
>>> Schoffstall told the Daily Caller, the Attorney for the District of Idaho,
>>> Josh Hurwit, said he was more interested in appeasing the Biden
>>> administration by hosting seminars to talk about hate crimes. Later on,
>>> when the FBI pushed Schoffstall to execute a search warrant against a
>>> “domestic extremist” group protesting LGBTQ activists, he refused. It
>>> eventually cost him his career.
>> There should be no surprise when future supervisors are put in charge
>> that favor conservative stances over the prior liberal views.
>> 
>> As Obama said "elections have consequences.”
> 
> Yeah, the will of the people take precedence when it is an overwhelming 
> majority.

Not in “liberal democracies”. People in them voted against mass immigration
year after year, but number of alien foreigners is only increasing, in most
cases rapidly. In USA itself people voted for mass deportations twice, in
2016 and 2024 (and, probably, in 2020), but they still got nothing. All the
polls now show that majority in US is for mass deportations. But Trump and
Homan already changed their rhetoric. Can you explain that?

How many years they’ll lie to you until you admit that you’re being fooled?

> That is what democracy is supposed to be about, even when it is a slight 
> majority.