So infamous, there's a newsgroup about him!

When someone acts as the sole arbiter of what should and should not be on
USENET, in their self-appointed capacity no less, it should be little =
surprise
that someone would create a group about him.

It's promulgation across the myriad of NNTP servers that host the group =
is also
not a surprise.

It must be so hard for him to continue to be a legend in his own mind =
when
everyone else thinks he's a dick.

But, in the spirit of only wishing to offer constructive criticism, I =
would
offer this:

Adam, instead of telling people what they, to your mind, did "wrong", how=
 about
reframing the discussion instead? Maybe something like this, for example:

"Hello,

I see you made a proposal. Let me help you. If you want a positive =
result, you
might want to consider adding x or y, maybe re-wording part b to include =
this,
or exclude that, and possibly adding a section to go over this other =
thing.

If you'd like some help with it, feel free to send me an email"


Instead of=20

"I AM A SNARKY LITTLE BITCH AND WILL SNARK AND MORE SNARK TO TELL YOU =
WHAT I
THINK YOU DID WRONG HERE AND MORE SNARK AT THE END CAUSE I WANT YOU TO =
RESPECT
MY SELF-GRANTED AUTHORITY"

Just a thought.

But then again, I don't have a USENET group that was formed to talk of my
exploits, so I could be wrong.

The weight of the evidence suggests that I am not, however.

Enjoy



--
OldbieOne [TM]
The One Who Tells It Like It is!
Brought to you by RetroPC