Re: Are the "WOKE" gaslighting our newest generations into self-mutilation?
pandora <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.agnosticism,alt.atheism,alt.checkmate |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 02 Oct 2022 11:27:43 -0700, TRAITOR JOE'S BIDEN BALONEY wrote: > Caution! Always wear ANSI approved goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! > > On Sun, 02 Oct 2022 17:23:55 +0000, pandora put forth the notion that: > # > > >> On Sun, 02 Oct 2022 10:16:36 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >> > In article <[email protected]>, >> > [email protected] says... >> >> >> >> On Sun, 02 Oct 2022 09:38:07 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >> >> >> > In article <[email protected]>, >> >> > [email protected] says... >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 02 Oct 2022 06:29:00 -0700, TRAITOR JOE'S BIDEN BALONEY >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Caution! Always wear ANSI approved goggles when reading posts >> >> >> > by Checkmate! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Sun, 02 Oct 2022 00:10:03 +0000, pandora put forth the >> >> >> > notion that: # >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Sat, 01 Oct 2022 16:20:01 -0700, TRAITOR JOE'S BIDEN >> >> >> >> BALONEY wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Caution! Always wear ANSI approved goggles when reading >> >> >> >> > posts by Checkmate! >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > On Sat, 01 Oct 2022 22:30:29 +0000, pandora put forth the >> >> >> >> > notion that: >> >> >> >> > # >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:23:59 -0700, TRAITOR JOE'S BIDEN >> >> >> >> >> BALONEY wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Caution! Always wear ANSI approved goggles when reading >> >> >> >> >> > posts by Checkmate! >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 22:00:55 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda put >> >> >> >> >> > forth the notion that: >> >> >> >> >> > # >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >> >> >> >> >> >>snowflakes, >> >> >> >> >> >>melt! >> >> >> >> >> >>On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 06:44:53 -0700, DIDDLER JIM'S GORMAN >> >> >> >> >> >>BALONEY waxed transphobic: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I didn't even know this was a thing until a few weeks >> >> >> >> >> >>> ago. >> >> >> >> >> >>> I thought the whole "transgender" movement was mainly >> >> >> >> >> >>> a >> >> >> >> >> >>> male phenomenon, with certain effeminate, homosexual, >> >> >> >> >> >>> biological males yearning to be something they will >> >> >> >> >> >>> never be: females. No matter how they try to alter >> >> >> >> >> >>> their appearance, or try to demand that we refer to >> >> >> >> >> >>> them as what they can only pretend to be, they'll >> >> >> >> >> >>> always be men. Bruce Jenner is a perfect example. >> >> >> >> >> >>> Despite his best efforts, >> >> >> >> >> >>> he looks hideously like a man in drag, and his new >> >> >> >> >> >>> soft-spoken voice does nothing to improve his new >> >> >> >> >> >>> persona. >> >> >> >> >> >>> Chastity Bono makes a more convincing male, but it >> >> >> >> >> >>> appears I may have gotten it wrong... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Proof you are wrong: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>https://www.sapiens.org/biology/biological-science- rejects- >> the- >> >> >> sex- >> >> >> >> >> binary-and-thats-good-for-humanity/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> According to a number of articles I've recently run >> >> >> >> >> >>> across, this may be a bigger problem among females than >> >> >> >> >> >>> males. I can sort of understand why... they spend the >> >> >> >> >> >>> first 10-12 years in one body, then suddenly discover >> >> >> >> >> >>> one day that the nipples that no one had ever had any >> >> >> >> >> >>> interest in, are budding out into a new and very >> >> >> >> >> >>> visible part of their identity. Some are happy to see >> >> >> >> >> >>> them, and some are embarrassed at this new part of >> >> >> >> >> >>> their identity that they can never hide, and the often >> >> >> >> >> >>> unwanted attention that comes with it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>And whose fault is that? Lecherous men, like the one you >> >> >> >> >> >>see in various reflective surfaces, Diddler. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> What shocked me, was a two-part series on Fox Nation, >> >> >> >> >> >>> showing quite graphically how far the assault on nature >> >> >> >> >> >>> has been allowed to go. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Fox Nation ......... LOL >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> The film shows girls obviously at the age of puberty, >> >> >> >> >> >>> with two long, horizontal scars across their chests >> >> >> >> >> >>> where they've had their breasts removed. Even the >> >> >> >> >> >>> nipples are gone! Clearly, they have no concept of how >> >> >> >> >> >>> this irreversible decision will impact the rest of >> >> >> >> >> >>> their adult lives. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>No lactation for you! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> A couple older victims of this barbaric practice were >> >> >> >> >> >>> also interviewed and expressed profound regrets. One >> >> >> >> >> >>> of the victims was stunningly beautiful. I felt >> >> >> >> >> >>> genuinely sad for her and wondered how her parents >> >> >> >> >> >>> could have even given their permission, >> >> >> >> >> >>> or if they were even required to. Even the schools are >> >> >> >> >> >>> aiding and abetting this gender confusion of underage >> >> >> >> >> >>> students and encouraging them to keep the matter secret >> >> >> >> >> >>> from their parents... >> >> >> >> >> >>> WHY? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>To protect them from dangerously bigoted parents, of >> >> >> >> >> >>course. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Unrelated: I only recently learned that pregnant >> >> >> >> >> >>> mothers are allowed to bring a baby to full term, and >> >> >> >> >> >>> then tell the doctor to "abort" (murder) it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>[citation needed] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> How and why did we ever get to this point? Even as an >> >> >> >> >> >>> agnostic, >> >> >> >> >> >>> I still sometimes wonder why we haven't all turned to >> >> >> >> >> >>> pillars of salt. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Just because you have a meltdown contemplating a thing, >> >> >> >> >> >>does not make that thing wrong, kooky. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Now go read that link: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>https://www.sapiens.org/biology/biological-science- rejects- >> the- >> >> >> sex- >> >> >> >> >> binary-and-thats-good-for-humanity/ >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > All your irrelevant distractions about fish biology >> >> >> >> >> > aside, this transgender bullshit that has all the signs >> >> >> >> >> > of a human-engineered fad, at least in females, could >> >> >> >> >> > actually be a long overdue backlash to the ridiculous >> >> >> >> >> > number of females who almost consider it mandatory to get >> >> >> >> >> > ridiculously over sized breast "augmentation". >> >> >> >> >> > Why can't people just settle for normalcy? I'm not even >> >> >> >> >> > sure >> >> >> >> >> > these young girls want to be boys, I think maybe they >> >> >> >> >> > just don't want boobs. Obviously, they haven't realized >> >> >> >> >> > teh Power of the booby. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Or perhaps they just don't want to be judged by whether or >> >> >> >> >> not they *have* boobs but rather as people deserving the >> >> >> >> >> same respect as others. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > They'll be judged for not having them too... probably much >> >> >> >> > more. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> That needs to end. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Humans will only quit judging each other when no one is >> >> >> > "different". >> >> >> > Kids are especially bad at this, which shows it's an innate >> >> >> > trait that we only learn to control with age and maturity. I'm >> >> >> > mostly talking about birth defects and hideous injuries in this >> >> >> > instance. >> >> >> >> >> >> Judge not lest ye be judged. >> >> > >> >> > From the bible and you said there was no God. >> >> >> >> Indeed. Men wrote that, not any god. >> >> >> >> >> > If a girl chooses to mutilate herself by cutting her breasts >> >> >> > off, my guess is older adults would be more likely to judge her >> >> >> > on that behavior than her appearance. I say it's a >> >> >> > psychological problem that should first be addressed by >> >> >> > counseling rather than a knife. People need time to adjust to >> >> >> > the changes of puberty, and are not likely to make rational >> >> >> > decisions at its onset if they're seeing it as an issue they're >> >> >> > uncomfortable with. >> >> >> >> >> >> I can agree with that. >> >> >> >> >> >> Given a few years into adulthood, how are they >> >> >> > going to feel when they don't look like other adults? I just >> >> >> > didn't know this was happening and think it's a new phenomenon >> >> >> > being pushed by the new anti-gender "Woke" crowd, which is >> >> >> > doing a lot of irreparable damage to affected individuals and >> >> >> > society. >> >> >> >> >> >> It's their business; no one else's. >> > >> > So you believe in the bible but you really don't? >> >> >> I believe the bible is a book written by men who were trying to >> understand the universe from their limited knowledge. > > It was written by men over 200 years after Jesus died, so none of them > ever knew him, or knew anybody who had known him. The men who wrote it > wrote under the names of the apostles to gain credibility. I suspect > the body of Jesus was "disappeared" and claimed to be a "resurrection". > A pretty convenient way of covering up any evidence, while also claiming > a miracle. Sounds plausible. > When you see all the political tricks and head trips politicians use > today and throughout history, you should realize that power hungry > people have always been clever enough to fool a sufficient number of > people to gain control. Con man Joseph Smith picked up on how the game > is played in 1820, when he claimed to have been given some magical > golden plates by an angel, which he kept hidden in a hat. He would > "translate" them to an assistant to create the "Book of Mormon". > Unfortunately, he later "gave them back to the angel" so they can't be > examined. A skeptic such as myself has a hard time buying any of it. Me too. > On the other hand, the more I learn about the complexities of living > organisms, the harder it is to imagine the number of fortuitous random > events it would take for there not to be something that had a hand in > our creation. I've always said if there's a god, he must be a scientist, > and we're merely lab rats in an experiment that's nearing its end... at > least as far as humans are concerned. That is also a possibility. Of course, that raises the question of who created him/her/it. Too much for my brain.