Re: sexual edits

On Feb 22, 2023, David Dalton wrote
(in article<[email protected]>):

> On Feb 22, 2023, David Dalton wrote
> (in article<[email protected]>):
>
> > As of 0300 UTC February 22, 2023, homo sapiens globally has
> > split, in terms of sexual compatibility and tendency to associate
> > (DNA adjustments will come later), into 55 equal human species.
> > As part of this, some abusive romantic relationships have
> > been split across species boundaries. The remaining
> > abusive romantic relationships have been made optimally
> > sexually compatible (see below).
> >
> > As of 0623 UTC February 22, 2023,
> > the sexual harmonics of 22% of humans have been adjusted
> > for better (usually optimal) sexual compatibility. This has
> > affected 57% of committed relationships. The remaining
> > 43% can be broken up into 22% who were already optimally
> > sexually compatible, 14% who were and remain partially
> > sexually compatible, and 7% who have been broken up
> > (all of whom who were incompatible and/or were in
> > abusive relationships, though some abusive relationships
> > were made optimally sexually compatible). Of course
> > I am pulling these numbers out of my... perineum. :-)
>
> Some incompatible relationships were made optimally
> sexually compatible. But in the case of platonic
> gay--lesbian parenting relationships not including
> at least one a.s.r. which have lasted at least the
> last 15 years without a breakup of more than a week
> and/or have resulted in at least one child (of the two)
> under 16, including adoptive or fetus, if each has at least
> one same sex partner then they have become
> bim--bif, which is partially compatible (less than
> optimally compatible and less likely to stick).
>
> Also there is one more case of breakup. If a
> partially compatible or incompatible relationship
> including at least one a.s.r. (assisted shaktipat
> recipient) has not lasted at least the last five
> years without a breakup of more than a week
> and neither partner is a parent of at least one
> child under 16, including adoptive or fetus,
> there was no adjustment, and they are broken
> up, since a.s.r. no longer have partial compatibility.
> This seems to apply to Joe and Jill Biden, and
> I have suggested new matches for them on
> the “various matches” thread on alt.religion.druid .
>
> But what about the platonic gay--lesbian example
> above, where each has at least one same sex
> partner, say another gay and another lesbian,
> but with at least one partner an a.s.r., and
> meeting the 5 years and/or child under 16
> criteria? They can’t become bim--bif as
> above since they the a..s.r. no longer have
> partial compatibility. So in this example
> the 2gays+2lesbians would have become
> bim-+bim+bimT+straight-type-2-F
> or
> straight-type-2-M+bifT+bif+bif
> who are all optimally compatible in both cases.
>
> My Eight Sexual Harmonics matchmaking theory is
> described on a subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns
> webpage.
>
> Note that optimal compatibility leads to longer
> lifespans than partial compatibility which in
> turn leads to longer lifespans (especially for the
> deceived, if any) than incompatibility. (There
> is no longer one-way attraction, so there
> should no longer be any deception.)

"You're a beautiful
A beautiful fucked up man
You're setting up your
Razor wire shrine
'Cause you're working
Building a mystery
Holding on and holding it in
Yeah, you're working
Building a mystery
And choosing so carefully”
(Sarah McLachlan)

-- 
David Dalton [email protected] https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
"I gave my love a golden feather/I gave my love a heart of stone/and when you
find a golden feather/it means you'll never lose your way back home." (R.R.)