Re: Blasphemy Day

% wrote:
> jojo wrote:
>> % wrote:
>>> jojo wrote:
>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of religion which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago is no longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circle,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, being on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> provides no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> become obsolete.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already 
>>>>>>>>>>>> knew I
>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
>>>>>>>>>> comment either way.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and 
>>>>>>>>> want to know
>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that's a nice dream.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Isn't it, though?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
>>>>>> your social circle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Bob,
>>>>>
>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet 
>>>>> away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dawn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> where did you get it , by the train tracks
>>
>> i got it because my cells differentiated because i have a y 
>> chromosome.. aaa capiche?
>>
> that's no reason

that is all the reason and the only reason.