Re: Blasphemy Day

jojo wrote:
> % wrote:
>> jojo wrote:
>>> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
>>>> % wrote:
>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of religion which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago is no longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020s and post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circle,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, being on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it provides no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become obsolete.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knew I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's a nice dream.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it, though?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your social circle.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Bob,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> where did you get it , by the train tracks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> i got it because my cells differentiated because i have a y 
>>>>>>>>>> chromosome.. aaa capiche?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that's no reason
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that is all the reason and the only reason.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face
>>>>>>
>>>>>> lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i think about 
>>>>>> it, i have never taken its pic...
>>>>>>
>>>>> and make sure to wear your top hat
>>>>
>>>> And your gay sweater
>>>
>>> i dont think i will take a photo of my penis.
>>>
>> yes in a top hat
> 
> hat or no hat.... wait top hat for the penis or the head?
> 
both