Re: Blasphemy Day
% <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:57:44 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.agnosticism,talk.philosophy.humanism,sci.skeptic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
jojo wrote: > % wrote: >> jojo wrote: >>> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote: >>>> Dawn Flood wrote: >>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, >>>>>>>>>>>>> being on >>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it >>>>>>>>>>>>> provides no >>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become >>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I >>>>>>>>>>>> was correct. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my >>>>>>>>>> comment either way. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want to know >>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of >>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> that's a nice dream. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Isn't it, though? >>>>>> >>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism >>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to >>>>>> your social circle. >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hey Bob, >>>>> >>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet away, >>>>> and until that happens, discretion is advised. >>>> >>>> I don't think a ban is necessary. He is fixed in his atheism. Utter >>>> sacrilege and blasphemy. Blasphemy is a victimless crime. >>> >>> >>> i dont understand why dawn insists on oppressing me!! >>> >> because you're a mouthy little dick face > > you dont think she is being totally unfair to me? i will go mad without > net. > she doesn't support your theories and it's her right not too , she don't think much of me either but she doesn't , say the things to me she says to you