Re: Blasphemy Day
% <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:59:19 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.agnosticism,talk.philosophy.humanism,sci.skeptic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
jojo wrote: > % wrote: >> jojo wrote: >>> % wrote: >>>> jojo wrote: >>>>> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote: >>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provides no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my >>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want to >>>>>>>>>>> know >>>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of >>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> that's a nice dream. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Isn't it, though? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism >>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to >>>>>>>> your social circle. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey Bob, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet >>>>>>> away, and until that happens, discretion is advised. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think a ban is necessary. He is fixed in his atheism. >>>>>> Utter sacrilege and blasphemy. Blasphemy is a victimless crime. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> i dont understand why dawn insists on oppressing me!! >>>>> >>>> because you're a mouthy little dick face >>> >>> you dont think she is being totally unfair to me? i will go mad >>> without net. >>> >> she doesn't support your theories and it's her right not too , >> she don't think much of me either but she doesn't , >> say the things to me she says to you > > yeah, she is acting like a dictator with me, throwing me in the gulag > and telling others to guard the gate. > she has that option there's nothing in the faq's about liking someone