Re: soles/souls in the whole ?

jojo <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:20:33 +0000
Newsgroups free.metaphysics,talk.religion.pantheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.atheism,alt.talk.creationism
Organization jieigyou
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dale wrote:
> On 7/12/2025 9:58 PM, jojo wrote:
>> Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
>>>
>>> Are there no soles/holes in the whole ?
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
>>>
>>> Or are there soles/holes in the whole ?
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism
>>>
>>> Impermanence in play ?
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impermanence
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.dalekelly.org/
>>>
>>
>> if you want to do seo, i dont think usenet is the place. but 
>> anyway, seo will die with ai usage.
>>
>> there is a new term these days, geo, generative engine 
>> optimization.
>>
> 
> I'm an R&D enthusiast
> 
> a sole piece (peace?) in the whole ?
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
> 
> no impermanence ?
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impermanence
> 
> complete stillness ?
> 
> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stillness
> 
> sole determinism in the whole ?
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
> 
> holes in the whole ?
> 
> impermanence ?
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impermanence
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism
> 
> black holes ?
> 
> impermanence ?
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impermanence
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole
> 
> do holes result in multiversal determinism ? not just a universal ?
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse
> 
> what is the verse of a multiverse ?
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verse
> 
> is a verse part of a piece's eternal song ?
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Song
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal
> 
> no impermanence ?
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impermanence
> 
> impermanence ?
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impermanence
> 
> just one singular permanence  ?
> 

is that really research? usually there is some sort of goal, not 
wandering the stream of consciousness.