Re: NASA's great conspiracy

On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 09:58:50 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>"Malte Runz"  wrote in message 
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>>On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:24:07 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>(snip)
>>
>>>Crashed craft retrieval cases have come out hundreds of times. ...
>>
>>Now, that's what I call a 'positive claim', and we all know what that
>>entails.
>>
>
>Only mainstream media followers and 'authority' followers have never heard 
>of that. Normies.

Of course I've heard the claims made before. Do you think you're the
only kook on the internet?


>>> ... Upgrade your
>>>sources.
>>
>>Name one.
>>
>
>Of course you don't know any except the mainstream info suppressing ones.

I can't possibly know what /your/ sources are. Von Däniken? Alex
Jones? Random Dude on Rumor Mill? Why don't you want to tell me?


>>And no, don't wiggle your way out the usual way, suggesting
>>I'm too lazy to find one myself.
>>
>
>You are lazy, two minute Google result believer.

Wiggle wiggle wiggle.

>>
>>Also, this is not about what my
>>sources have to say, it's all about /your/ sources.
>>
>
>But your sources are lying/suppressing crap. That's the real issue.

You're the one making the claim, therefore you provide the evidence.
This can't be a new concept to you.


>>So, do you have an 'upgraded source' that provides evidence for the
>>retrieval of a crashed craft created by an alien race?
>>
>
>I have plenty ...

So you say, but are unable to provide any. I call your bluff... again.

> ... but you will never search for yourself and switch. ...

I can find hundreds, if not thousands, of people saying the same shit
you do, all claiming to have the evidence. Grainy images of out of
focus gray blobs, un-named specialists and insiders spilling the
beans, ancient wisdom, inter stellar revelations, anecdotal evidence
of abductions, and of course, 'They are hiding the truth from us'.

Understand that I'm interested in learning what /you/ have found and
where you found it. 


> ... You're not 
>interested.

Of course I'm interested. I ask you for an answer every time. What
evidence have /you/ seen?


>>My sole point is to expose you as a liar, and every time you fail to
>>provide a source for your claims my point is proven.
>>
>
>No, ...

Yes. Did you, or didn't you, provide a source? You didn't. Instead you
evaded my questions exactly the way I predicted you would.

(snip the wiggle wiggle wiggle.) 



-- 
Malte Runz