Re: NASA's great conspiracy
Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> Mon, 07 Jul 2025 13:20:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports |
|---|---|
| Organization | ViperNews - www.vipernews.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]: > "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> >>"Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]: >> >>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>> news:[email protected]... >>>> >>>>JTEM <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]: >>>> >>>>> On 7/5/25 9:53 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So evidence from government officials is trustworthy. >>>>> >>>>> That's not an argument. >>>>> >>>>> It's fallacious. In fact, Google a list of "Fallacious Arguments," >>>>> you'll find one that matches... >>>>> >>>>> Truth is that there is no reason to believe government sources, >>>> >>>> >>>> Every weather map you have looked is >>>>from government sources. >>>> >>>> Everytime you rely on GPS data you >>>>are trusting government sources. >>>> >>>> Every weather forecast on your >>>>local news is from government >>>>sources. >>>> >>> >>> Not necessarily or strictly. And those things are of low importance >>> to the corrupt. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> All the economic data you get >>>>relies on government scources. >>>> >>> >>> That data is actually slanted, to cover up their frauding of the >>> system. >>> >> >> >> Is this part of the Illuminati Conspiracy, >>the Rothschilds Conspiracy, the Jewish Bankers >>Conspiracy or the Skull And Bones Conspiracy? >> >> You believe in so many I am surprised you >>can keep them straight.......... >> > > It takes time and brains to see and understand systemic corruption. What in not corrupt, in your opinion? > Where's yours? > Systemic corruption is a time proven fact. So why do you run away when asked for proof of this "fact"?