Re: NASA's great conspiracy
Malte Runz <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Jul 2025 20:36:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 13 Jul 2025 21:30:46 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote: >"Malte Runz" wrote in message >news:[email protected]... >> >>On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 08:55:20 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]... >>>> >>>>On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 08:52:17 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected]... >>>>>> >>>>>>On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>(snip) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were still >>>>>>>alive >>>>>>>and taken to facilities for study. >>>>>> >>>>>>Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think >>>>>>about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these things with >>>>>>a straight face. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the subject? >>>>>It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up. >>>> >>>>Neither of us is doing actual "research" on the topic. We both sift >>>>through the files looking at material other people have produced. We >>>>do not discover anything that isn't already known, or, in your case, >>>>not really known per se, but claimed nonetheless. >>>> >>> >>>You don't even know what constitutes research so you can't talk. >> >>If you show me your definition, I'll show you mine. >> > >I've already shown you plenty, ... We're talking about the definition of the term 'research'. How do you define it? (snip) -- Malte Runz