Re: NASA caught LYING TO YOU again!

On 7/29/2025 1:02 PM, JTEM wrote:
> On 7/29/25 11:30 AM, jojo wrote:
> 
>> doesnt look like it.
> 
> You know what it looks like?  Mental illness.
> 
> #1.  I said that the Dimethyl sulfide in question was already
> confirmed. It was detected and later detected again. AND I
> said that the claim here wasn't that NASA found no evidence
> for it but, no "Strong" evidence. Which means that their
> findings were CONSISTENT WITH Dimethyl sulfide, rather than
> excluding it.
> 
> Any dispute? Any word addressing this at all?
> 
> Nope.
> 
> #2.  I said that Dimethyl sulfide was not the only biosignature
> detected. There were others. I said that Dimethyl sulfide was
> so important because there are no non-biological sources.
> 
> Any dispute? Was a single word acknowledged or addressed?
> 
> Nope.
> 
> #3.  I said that NASA, besides NOT claiming that they found no
> evidence for it, merely no "Strong" evidence," dismissed this
> Dimethyl sulfide as something that could have come from a simple
> chemical reaction. But, this is wrong because, as I already
> pointed out, as far as we know the only known sources are
> biological.
> 
> Any dispute? Was this addressed at all? Was it acknowledged?
> 
> Nope.
> 
> #4.  I said that this was consistent. That, NASA is consistent
> in it's denials of evidence for life outside the earth, and
> even misinforming the public on the subject. I reiterated facts
> raised in a previous thread regarding the Mars lander and the
> supposed search for life there.
> 
> Any dispute? Was there so much as a single counter example? Any
> attempt to address this fact at all?
> 
> Nope.
> 
> 
> 
> I get that people can  /Like/  a particular answer over others,
> but that's not even the problem here. This thread is about me
> raising facts that should set off alarm bells in any so called
> "Skeptic," while the collective spasms & tries to stop any
> conversation it is unable to control.
> 

Then type all of this up and submit it as a manuscript; here's one place 
that you can go to today:

https://arxiv.org/

You'll get fairly prompt feedback from experts.  I am not an expert; 
few, if any others here, are experts either.  Get back to us when your 
paper is online and any replies that you receive; please be sure to 
include links.

Dawn